[過去ログ]
純粋・応用数学(含むガロア理論)3 (1002レス)
純粋・応用数学(含むガロア理論)3 http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1595166668/
上
下
前次
1-
新
通常表示
512バイト分割
レス栞
抽出解除
レス栞
このスレッドは過去ログ倉庫に格納されています。
次スレ検索
歴削→次スレ
栞削→次スレ
過去ログメニュー
893: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆yH25M02vWFhP [] 2020/08/29(土) 13:28:29.84 ID:T0GrcKp2 >>892 つづき (iii) If {rs}s∈S is an almost zero family of elements of R such that Σs∈S rss =0, then rs =0 for each s in S. (iv) If {rs}s∈S and {r's}s∈S are two almost zero families of elements of R such that Σs∈S rss = Σs∈S r'ss, then rs=r's for all s in S. We now give some examples to illustrate various types of linearly indepen dent subsets of modules. P216 8. CHARACTERIZATION OF DIVISION RINGS We now turn our attention to describing those rings R with the property that every R-module is a free R-module. The reader is already familiar with the fact that fields have this property. We now show that division rings, which are the natural generalization of the notation of a field to arbitrary, not necessarily commutative, rings, also have the same property. Definition A ring R is called a division ring if it is not the zero ring and every nonzero element in R is a unit in R. Obviously, a commutative ring is a division ring if and only if it is a field. So fields are special cases of division rings. In order to show that every module over a division ring has a basis, it is convenient to have the notion of a maximal linearly independent subset of a module over an arbitrary ring R. Definition A subset 5 of an R- module M is said to be a maximal linearly independent subset of M if S is linearly independent and S is not contained in any larger linearly independent subset of M. The main result about maximal linearly independent subsets of a module M is that every linearly independent subset of M is contained in a maximal such subset of M. The proof of this fact is the burden of the following. つづく http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1595166668/893
894: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆yH25M02vWFhP [] 2020/08/29(土) 13:29:38.29 ID:T0GrcKp2 >>893 つづき Basic Properties 8.1 Let M be an R-module. (b) Every linearly independent subset S of M is contained in a maximal linearly independent subset of M. (c) M has a maximal linearly independent subset. (d) If M is a free R-module, then every basis for M is a maximal linearly indepen dent subset of M. PROOF: 略 P217 Proposition 8.2 Let D be a division ring. Then the following statements are equivalent for a subset B of a D-module M: (a) B is a basis for M. (b) B is a maximal linearly independent subset of M. Since every module has a maximal linearly independent subset, every module over a division ring D has a basis and is therefore a free D-module. PROOF: Because the reader has already shown that every basis of a module is a maximal linearly independent subset of the module, we only have to show that (b) implies (a). 略 P218 This finishes the proof that a maximal linearly independent subset B of a D-module M is a basis for M because it generates M. Having established that all modules over division rings are free, we will have a complete description of all nonzero rings R with the property that all R -modules are free if we show that any nonzero ring with this property must be a division ring. Because we are trying to describe when a ring is a division ring in terms of its module theory, it is reasonable to expect that a module-theoretic description of when a ring is a division ring would be helpful. We do this now in terms of the properties of the R-module R. つづく http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1595166668/894
メモ帳
(0/65535文字)
上
下
前次
1-
新
書
関
写
板
覧
索
設
栞
歴
スレ情報
赤レス抽出
画像レス抽出
歴の未読スレ
AAサムネイル
Google検索
Wikipedia
ぬこの手
ぬこTOP
3.499s*