[過去ログ]
純粋・応用数学(含むガロア理論)3 (1002レス)
純粋・応用数学(含むガロア理論)3 http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1595166668/
上
下
前次
1-
新
通常表示
512バイト分割
レス栞
抽出解除
レス栞
このスレッドは過去ログ倉庫に格納されています。
次スレ検索
歴削→次スレ
栞削→次スレ
過去ログメニュー
892: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆yH25M02vWFhP [] 2020/08/29(土) 13:27:18.99 ID:T0GrcKp2 >>891 つづき P210 7. FREE R-MODULES Undoubtedly, the modules that are most familiar to the reader are vector spaces over a field. Probably the most distinctive feature of the theory of vector spaces is that every vector space has a basis. After generalizing the notion of a basis from vector spaces over fields to modules over arbitrary rings, we introduce the notion of a free module over an arbitrary ring. Namely, an R -module is a free R -module if and only if it has a basis. Definition Let M be an R-module. A subset S of M is said to be a linearly independent subset of M if each finite subset of distinct elements s1, . . . , sn in S has the property that given r1, . . . , rn in R such that Σi=1〜n risi =0, then each ri = 0 for i = 1, . . . , n. Before giving examples of linearly independent subsets of modules, it is convenient to have the following easily verified properties. Basic Properties 7.1 Let M be an R-module. (a) The empty set is a linearly independent subset of M. (b) A subset S of M consisting of a single element m is a linearly independent subset of M if and only if for any r in R we have rm = 0 implies r = 0. Hence, the subset {m} is linearly independent if and only if the morphism of R-modules R→M given by r→rm is a monomorphism. (c) If S is a linearly independent subset of M, then every subset of S is also a linearly independent subset of M. (d) For a subset S of M, the following statements are equivalent: (i)S is a linearly independent subset of M. (ii) Each finite subset of S is a linearly independent subset of M. つづく http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1595166668/892
893: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆yH25M02vWFhP [] 2020/08/29(土) 13:28:29.84 ID:T0GrcKp2 >>892 つづき (iii) If {rs}s∈S is an almost zero family of elements of R such that Σs∈S rss =0, then rs =0 for each s in S. (iv) If {rs}s∈S and {r's}s∈S are two almost zero families of elements of R such that Σs∈S rss = Σs∈S r'ss, then rs=r's for all s in S. We now give some examples to illustrate various types of linearly indepen dent subsets of modules. P216 8. CHARACTERIZATION OF DIVISION RINGS We now turn our attention to describing those rings R with the property that every R-module is a free R-module. The reader is already familiar with the fact that fields have this property. We now show that division rings, which are the natural generalization of the notation of a field to arbitrary, not necessarily commutative, rings, also have the same property. Definition A ring R is called a division ring if it is not the zero ring and every nonzero element in R is a unit in R. Obviously, a commutative ring is a division ring if and only if it is a field. So fields are special cases of division rings. In order to show that every module over a division ring has a basis, it is convenient to have the notion of a maximal linearly independent subset of a module over an arbitrary ring R. Definition A subset 5 of an R- module M is said to be a maximal linearly independent subset of M if S is linearly independent and S is not contained in any larger linearly independent subset of M. The main result about maximal linearly independent subsets of a module M is that every linearly independent subset of M is contained in a maximal such subset of M. The proof of this fact is the burden of the following. つづく http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1595166668/893
メモ帳
(0/65535文字)
上
下
前次
1-
新
書
関
写
板
覧
索
設
栞
歴
スレ情報
赤レス抽出
画像レス抽出
歴の未読スレ
AAサムネイル
Google検索
Wikipedia
ぬこの手
ぬこTOP
0.044s