[過去ﾛｸﾞ] 現代数学の系譜 工学物理雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む79 (1002ﾚｽ)

現代数学の系譜 工学物理雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む79 http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1573769803/

上下前次1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割 ﾚｽ栞
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

ﾘﾛｰﾄﾞ規制です｡10分ほどで解除するので､他のﾌﾞﾗｳｻﾞへ避難してください｡

---

228: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む ◆e.a0E5TtKE [] 2019/12/01(日) 13:41:41.93 ID:id6ENHqe >>227 つづき No mathematicians are known to support the superficial take of Scholze?Stix on IUT. Their short lived study of IUT17 stands in shark contrast with the deep study of it by the other mathematicians mentioned above, who asked/made many good questions, remarks and comments. If one does not apply appropriate efforts to study the area of a fundamentally new theory, one does not become an expert in it, whatever one’s own different area of specialisation is and achievements in it. Of course, it is still possible to contribute useful questions, comments, remarks in relation to more conventional parts of the theory, e.g. those that came in 2012 from two analytic number theorists. To make a mistake in one’s mathematical study is rather normal, especially when one tries to understand a complex theory going much deeper than standard research. However, to publicly talk about faults in another theory for several years without ever having any valid evidence of the faults is irresponsible. The failure of those two German mathematicians should not stop serious researchers to study IUT. The failure of Mrs. Lancaster to understand the question does not in any way imply anything negative about the question. 4. Developments. Several are mentioned above. The book by F. Kato about IUT provides more general information about various features of IUT to the wider audience. This book was in the list of top twenty bestselling books in all subject areas on amazon.co.jp and was awarded the Yaesu prize. There are new developments related to IUT, in different directions. Four international workshops on anabelian geometry and IUT are organised during a special RIMS Project Research year on Expanding Horizons of Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory in 2020?2021 18, supported by the new Center for Research in Next-Generation Geometry. (引用終り) 以上 http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1573769803/228

229: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む ◆e.a0E5TtKE [] 2019/12/01(日) 13:46:25.15 ID:id6ENHqe >>228 補足 （Google 訳手直し） 4.Developments いくつかは上記で言及されています。 F.加藤によるIUTに関する本は、より多くの聴衆にIUTのさまざまな機能に関するより一般的な情報を提供します。 この本は、アマゾンのすべての主題分野のベストセラートップ20のリストにあり、八重洲賞を受賞しました。 IUTに関連する新しい開発が、さまざまな方向にあります。 アナベル幾何学とIUTに関する4つの国際ワークショップは、2020年から2021年までの宇宙間タイヒミュラー理論の地平線拡大に関する特別なRIMSプロジェクト研究年に開催されます。 (引用終り) これみると、加藤本の八重洲賞を受賞に言及しているので つい最近書かれたものと分かるね（＾＾； http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1573769803/229

231: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む ◆e.a0E5TtKE [] 2019/12/01(日) 13:54:40.29 ID:id6ENHqe >>228 補足 (引用開始) To make a mistake in one’s mathematical study is rather normal, especially when one tries to understand a complex theory going much deeper than standard research. However, to publicly talk about faults in another theory for several years without ever having any valid evidence of the faults is irresponsible. The failure of those two German mathematicians should not stop serious researchers to study IUT. The failure of Mrs. Lancaster to understand the question does not in any way imply anything negative about the question. (引用終り) http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1573769803/231

---

ﾒﾓ帳

(0/65535文字)

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

Google検索

Wikipedia

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.030s