[過去ﾛｸﾞ]
現代数学の系譜 工学物理雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む74 (1002ﾚｽ)
現代数学の系譜 工学物理雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む74 http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1564659345/
上
下
前次
1-
新
通常表示
512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割
ﾚｽ栞
抽出解除
ﾚｽ栞
このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索
歴削→次ｽﾚ
栞削→次ｽﾚ
過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ
ﾘﾛｰﾄﾞ規制
です｡10分ほどで解除するので､
他のﾌﾞﾗｳｻﾞ
へ避難してください｡
820: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む ◆e.a0E5TtKE [] 2019/08/14(水) 21:33:48.79 ID:Qpe2jc/f おサル I think it is ok, because the only probability measure we need is uniform probability on {0,1,…,N-1 おれ but other people argue it's not ok, because we would need to define a measure on sequences, and moreover axiom of choice messes everything up. ｗ（＾＾； https://mathoverflow.net/questions/151286/probabilities-in-a-riddle-involving-axiom-of-choice Probabilities in a riddle involving axiom of choice Dec 9 '13 (抜粋) asked Dec 9 '13 at 16:16 Denis I think it is ok, because the only probability measure we need is uniform probability on {0,1,…,N-1}, but other people argue it's not ok, because we would need to define a measure on sequences, and moreover axiom of choice messes everything up. http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1564659345/820
830: １３２人目の素数さん [] 2019/08/15(木) 06:30:27.36 ID:R2b+aaQz >>820 >need to define a measure on sequences 数列の測度の定義は全く必要ない １００列は定数 確率変数ではない そもそもriddleは確率すら出てこない １００人がそれぞれ異なる１００列を選べば ９９人はかならず当たるという話 これはPrussですら反論不能 否定したら馬鹿ｗ http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1564659345/830
857: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む ◆e.a0E5TtKE [] 2019/08/15(木) 12:22:17.76 ID:FaDqkhIK >>856 補足 （>>820より） おサル I think it is ok, because the only probability measure we need is uniform probability on {0,1,…,N-1} おれ but other people argue it's not ok, because we would need to define a measure on sequences, and moreover axiom of choice messes everything up. ｗ（＾＾； https://mathoverflow.net/questions/151286/probabilities-in-a-riddle-involving-axiom-of-choice Probabilities in a riddle involving axiom of choice Dec 9 '13 (抜粋) asked Dec 9 '13 at 16:16 Denis I think it is ok, because the only probability measure we need is uniform probability on {0,1,…,N-1}, but other people argue it's not ok, because we would need to define a measure on sequences, and moreover axiom of choice messes everything up. http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1564659345/857
ﾒﾓ帳
(0/65535文字)
上
下
前次
1-
新
書
関
写
板
覧
索
設
栞
歴
ｽﾚ情報
赤ﾚｽ抽出
画像ﾚｽ抽出
歴の未読ｽﾚ
AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ
Google検索
Wikipedia
ぬこの手
ぬこTOP
0.032s