[過去ログ]
現代数学の系譜 工学物理雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む74 (1002レス)
現代数学の系譜 工学物理雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む74 http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1564659345/
上
下
前次
1-
新
通常表示
512バイト分割
レス栞
抽出解除
レス栞
このスレッドは過去ログ倉庫に格納されています。
次スレ検索
歴削→次スレ
栞削→次スレ
過去ログメニュー
リロード規制
です。10分ほどで解除するので、
他のブラウザ
へ避難してください。
791: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む ◆e.a0E5TtKE [] 2019/08/14(水) 17:01:40.68 ID:rg2Nhb+h >>773 補足 (>>787より抜粋) おサルさん、(>>692より)【必死のパッチ】やなww(^^; おサルさん、墓穴だなw https://mathoverflow.net/questions/151286/probabilities-in-a-riddle-involving-axiom-of-choice Probabilities in a riddle involving axiom of choice Dec 9 '13 (抜粋) asked Dec 9 '13 at 16:16 Denis I think it is ok, because the only probability measure we need is uniform probability on {0,1,…,N-1}, but other people argue it's not ok, because we would need to define a measure on sequences, and moreover axiom of choice messes everything up. Alexander Pruss Let's go back to the riddle. Suppose u ̄ is chosen randomly. The most natural option is that it is a nontrivial i.i.d. sequence (uk), independent of the random index i which is uniformly distributed over [100]={0,...,99}. In general, Mj will be nonmeasurable (one can prove this in at least some cases). We likewise have no reason to think that M is measurable. But without measurability, we can't make sense of talk of the probability that the guess will be correct. Denis Dec 17 '13 at 15:21 Our choice of index i is made randomly, but for this we only need the uniform distribution on {0,…,n}. It is made independently of the opponent's choice. Tony Huynh Dec 9 '13 at 17:37 In order for such a question to make sense, it is necessary to put a probability measure on the space of functions f:N→R. Note that to execute your proposed strategy, we only need a uniform measure on {1,…,N}, but to make sense of the phrase it fails with probability at most 1/N, we need a measure on the space of all outcomes. The answer will be different depending on what probability space is chosen of course. If it were somehow possible to put a 'uniform' measure on the space of all outcomes, then indeed one could guess correctly with arbitrarily high precision, but such a measure doesn't exist. (引用終り) http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1564659345/791
792: 132人目の素数さん [] 2019/08/14(水) 17:05:25.60 ID:c6g6R1pg >>791 自分でも理解できてないコピペは無駄 ・測度が必要は誤り、ウソ ・Huynhの発言は全然見当違いの馬鹿丸出し スレ主はトンデモキチガイ馬鹿wwwwwww http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1564659345/792
793: 132人目の素数さん [] 2019/08/14(水) 17:06:44.17 ID:MPteNw3f >>791 スレ主発狂w http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1564659345/793
798: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む ◆e.a0E5TtKE [] 2019/08/14(水) 17:38:27.88 ID:rg2Nhb+h >>791 追加 サルは、(>>692より)【必死のパッチ】やなww(^^; おサルさん、墓穴だなw http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1564659345/798
メモ帳
(0/65535文字)
上
下
前次
1-
新
書
関
写
板
覧
索
設
栞
歴
スレ情報
赤レス抽出
画像レス抽出
歴の未読スレ
AAサムネイル
Google検索
Wikipedia
ぬこの手
ぬこTOP
0.030s