[過去ﾛｸﾞ] 現代数学の系譜　カントル　超限集合論 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

ﾘﾛｰﾄﾞ規制です｡10分ほどで解除するので､他のﾌﾞﾗｳｻﾞへ避難してください｡

---

505(1): 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆e.a0E5TtKE 2019/11/27(水)22:11 ID:qnEhNItW(10/12) AAS
>>504

つづき

(This can happen when the model lacks the sets or functions necessary to witness the infinitude of these sets.)
On account of the incompleteness theorems, no first-order predicate, nor even any recursive scheme of first-order predicates, can characterize the standard part of all such models. So, at least from the point of view of first-order logic, one can only hope to describe finiteness approximately.

More generally, informal notions like set, and particularly finite set, may receive interpretations across a range of formal systems varying in their axiomatics and logical apparatus. The best known axiomatic set theories include Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF), Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC),
Von Neumann?Bernays?Godel set theory (NBG), Non-well-founded set theory, Bertrand Russell's Type theory and all the theories of their various models. One may also choose among classical first-order logic, various higher-order logics and intuitionistic logic.

A formalist might see the meaning[citation needed] of set varying from system to system. Some kinds of Platonists might view particular formal systems as approximating an underlying reality.
省4

---

506(1): 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆e.a0E5TtKE 2019/11/27(水)22:12 ID:qnEhNItW(11/12) AAS
>>505

つづき

Various properties that single out the finite sets among all sets in the theory ZFC turn out logically inequivalent in weaker systems such as ZF or intuitionistic set theories. Two definitions feature prominently in the literature, one due to Richard Dedekind, the other to Kazimierz Kuratowski. (Kuratowski's is the definition used above.)

A set S is called Dedekind infinite if there exists an injective, non-surjective function {\displaystyle f:S\rightarrow S}f:S\rightarrow S.
Such a function exhibits a bijection between S and a proper subset of S, namely the image of f. Given a Dedekind infinite set S, a function f, and an element x that is not in the image of f, we can form an infinite sequence of distinct elements of S, namely {\displaystyle x,f(x),f(f(x)),...}x,f(x),f(f(x)),....
Conversely, given a sequence in S consisting of distinct elements {\displaystyle x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},...}x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},..., we can define a function f such that on elements in the sequence {\displaystyle f(x_{i})=x_{i+1}}{\displaystyle f(x_{i})=x_{i+1}} and f behaves like the identity function otherwise.
Thus Dedekind infinite sets contain subsets that correspond bijectively with the natural numbers. Dedekind finite naturally means that every injective self-map is also surjective.
省4

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.048s