[過去ﾛｸﾞ] 現代数学の系譜 工学物理雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む62 (1002ﾚｽ)

現代数学の系譜 工学物理雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む62 http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1551963737/

上下前次1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割 ﾚｽ栞
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

550: １３２人目の素数さん [sage] 2019/03/19(火) 22:39:31.66 ID:abwfzbuH >>546 これは酷い http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1551963737/550

552: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む ◆e.a0E5TtKE [sage] 2019/03/19(火) 22:48:50.15 ID:EYNP5QFV >>550 https://www.quora.com/If-the-Euler-Mascheroni-constant-%CE%B3-is-irrational-is-it-transcendental-or-algebraic Eric Platt, PhD in Mathematics Answered Sep 14, 2018 We don’t know if it is transcendental or algebraic. If we find out that it is transcendental we would know that it is irrational as well, which we also don’t know. My personal guess is that it is transcendental and thus irrational. I see no reason for it to end up as a convenient algebraic number, let alone a rational one. http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1551963737/552

---

ﾒﾓ帳

(0/65535文字)

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

Google検索

Wikipedia

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.037s