[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Chat in English (英語で雑談) part 213 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ
232(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 46e3-XrkK) 2019/09/24(火)01:18 ID:tAYW/YEb0(2/8) AAS
Oh no, I am exhausted to the point where I put ‘because’ twice in the sentence.
233(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 619d-CYGD) 2019/09/24(火)01:52 ID:6a2oo+o00(1/4) AAS
>>231
That is really good. If you keep doing that everyday, you will get used to it and be fluent in the not too distant future.
234(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 46e3-XrkK) 2019/09/24(火)01:57 ID:tAYW/YEb0(3/8) AAS
>>233
I really hope so. The problem is my trial period has expired and I now have to pay billion bucks.
(But probably well worth the price considering the effect!)
235: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 46e3-XrkK) 2019/09/24(火)02:00 ID:tAYW/YEb0(4/8) AAS
Don’t get me wrong, I am not a 工作員.
236(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 619d-CYGD) 2019/09/24(火)02:01 ID:6a2oo+o00(2/4) AAS
>>234
Maybe you should try cheap ones. Like I used to be a member of DMM eikaiwa or something. The fee was like 4,000 yen or so.
237(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 46e3-XrkK) 2019/09/24(火)02:07 ID:tAYW/YEb0(5/8) AAS
>>236
I think I should, as the one I tried was actually DMM and they currently charge around ¥6500 at the cheapest (i.e. 1 session/day). Thank you for your advice!
238: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 619d-CYGD) 2019/09/24(火)03:09 ID:6a2oo+o00(3/4) AAS
>>237
Jeez. It’s so expensive now...
I should stick to doing “1人英会話” then...
239: (ｽﾌﾟｯｯ Sd82-E2fJ) 2019/09/24(火)03:53 ID:HJEGeABVd(1) AAS
>>229
Thank you for your information.
>>231
You seem to be already fluent.
240(2): 名無しさん＠日本語勉強中 (CA 0H69-Dkz/) 2019/09/24(火)07:28 ID:sGonzLr8H(1/15) AAS
>>231
>>232
Your English (at least in written form) sounds quite good and natural. You are definitely on the right track. Keep it up!
If you don't mind me asking, how have you been studying English?
I'm a native English speaker who's studying Japanese, and my main philosophy when it comes to studying is "input before output".
That is, I try to immerse myself (in other words, "get input") in natural Japanese as much as possible, so that I actually understand the language before trying to speak (in other words, "output") by myself.
I'm wondering if you are using a similar approach for your English, especially since you said it was your first English lession.
If so, then it seems to be working for you.
241(1): 名無しさん＠日本語勉強中 (CA 0H69-Dkz/) 2019/09/24(火)07:43 ID:sGonzLr8H(2/15) AAS
I just want to ask something to all the native Japanese speakers in this thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrHwPv7gUCE
Would you say that this guy's Japanese is good? Be honest.
I ask because I'm mainly following this guy's advice for how to learn languages.
He sounds quite good to me, but I'm not a Japanese native, so I don't feel like I can really accurately judge for myself.
242(1): (ｽﾌﾟｯｯ Sd82-E2fJ) 2019/09/24(火)08:11 ID:+BTOhAIRd(1) AAS
>>241
He is very good.
Marsha Krakower speaks perfect Japanese.
243(1): 名無しさん＠日本語勉強中 (CA 0H69-Dkz/) 2019/09/24(火)09:37 ID:sGonzLr8H(3/15) AAS
>>242
Thank you for the response.
I hadn't heard of Marsha Krakower before.
It seems like she was born in Japan, so she's probably been getting Japanese input all her life, and is basically a native.
Thane Camus's Japanese is also perfect from what I hear, but he's been living in Japan since he was like 6, so he's also gotten tons of input and practice.
I bet his Japanese is probably even better than his English by now.
I think Matt (from the video I linked) is pretty impressive because he learned Japanese without leaving the United States,
so he didn't get the advantage of getting to live in Japan and being surrounded by the language all the time.
He had to build a "Japanese-only" environment all on his own, mainly through the internet.
I'm trying to replicate his approach since I have no plans to actually ever go to Japan, but I would like to know the language.
省1
244(1): (ｽﾌﾟｯｯ Sd82-E2fJ) 2019/09/24(火)09:58 ID:EXUjFbIvd(1) AAS
>>243
I didn't know she was born in Japan. How about Peter Barakan？
Matt Japanese isn't perfect. But it's incredible to get that ability without living in Japan.
245: 名無しさん＠日本語勉強中 (CA 0H69-Dkz/) 2019/09/24(火)10:15 ID:sGonzLr8H(4/15) AAS
>>154
You are correct.
I think one reason for this is that almost no Japanese students are aware that pitch accent (高低アクセント) is a thing that even exists, or if they do, they don't think it's important.
The canonical examples are how 箸が, 端が, and 橋が all have different pitch accent when spoken. Or 雨 and 飴.
For most students of Japanese, their study of pitch accent stops at these two examples.
But it's not just these words; really, EVERY word in Japanese has its own pitch accent, just like how every word in English has its own stress on certain syllables.
However, because you don't "need" correct pitch accent to simply be *understood*, most Japanese language students think that Japanese pronunciation is easy,
even though their intonation sounds unnatural as fuck, and they're constantly getting pitch accent wrong.
It's not like Chinese where bad pronunciation will keep you from being understood.
But people who say "Japanese is easy" seriously underestimate how hard it is to reach a native level at speaking the language.
省1
246(2): 名無しさん＠日本語勉強中 (CA 0H69-Dkz/) 2019/09/24(火)10:28 ID:sGonzLr8H(5/15) AAS
>>244
Peter Barakan seems to have been born and raised in England, so if his Japanese is really perfect, then that's certainly impressive.
I wonder why some people are able to able to learn foreign languages to perfection, while others never reach that point, even after immersing themselves in the language for decades.
Does it come down to their studying habits, or just some sort of natural abilities?
At any rate, in English we have a common saying: "Don't let perfect be the enemy of good".
In other words, it's better to keep trying and to become very good at something, than to give up because you feel like you will never be perfect.
247(1): (ｽﾌﾟｯｯ Sd82-E2fJ) 2019/09/24(火)11:02 ID:KkiC7pOjd(1) AAS
>>246
You don't need to be perfect. I can't speak English that much. But I'm interested in perfect speaking person. I mean I want to know how they learned foreign language.
248: 名無しさん＠日本語勉強中 (CA 0H69-Dkz/) 2019/09/24(火)11:13 ID:sGonzLr8H(6/15) AAS
>>247
Yeah, same. I'm also very interested in their methods.
Those guys like Peter Barakan could probably make tons of money if they marketed their language learning methods to the masses.
But they seem less interested in that, and more interested in just living their lives.
Maybe they just don't want us to know their secret...
249(2): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲWW 86de-8ldJ) 2019/09/24(火)11:51 ID:mWkzQVGx0(1/2) AAS
>>246
I'm not trying to downplay their effort and of course practice and immersion are the most important but I think some people are just naturally good at languages.
There are people who are good at context reading, pronouncing clearly, giving a speech, writing a novel and then there ard some who are not.
Even natives have varying levels of abilities at their language like that so it's only natural that the same applies to language learners.
250: 名無しさん＠日本語勉強中 (CA 0H69-Dkz/) 2019/09/24(火)12:36 ID:sGonzLr8H(7/15) AAS
>>249
Yeah, I have no doubt that some people are just naturally better at learning at a certain rate than others.
And of course, if you're a natural mimic, then pronunciation and such are going to come easier to you.
After all, language is mostly mimicry and natural mimics have a huge advantage when it comes to that.
I'm still interested in the overall process and theory behind language learning, though.
Take Matt, for example. He's not perfect at Japanese,
but he's only been speaking the language for a fraction of the time that Peter Barakan has.
I wonder, if Matt keeps up with his immersion-based approach to language learning,
if he will ever reach perfection,
or if he will just plateau at "almost, but not quite perfect" like so many other learners do.
省5
251(1): 名無しさん＠日本語勉強中 (CA 0H69-Dkz/) 2019/09/24(火)12:38 ID:sGonzLr8H(8/15) AAS
>>249
Another thing I'm interested in, is how long did it take people like Peter Barakan to become perfect?
Surely they weren't just speaking flawlessly from day one.
But there's so little documentation on the subject.
It's like, should you take it as, "if you've been studying for x years and you're still not perfect by then, you'll never be perfect"?
If it took him 2 years to reach perfection then I'd surely believe he's a genius.
Nobody who's not FUCKING EXCEPTIONAL learns perfect Japanese in 2 years.
But if it took him 20 years, then I have to wonder if it's something environmental rather than genetic still.
Not that I think it matters THAT much, whether you have a subtle accent or not.
I'm sure that everyone would agree that Dave Spector speaks excellent Japanese even if he has a foreign accent and such.
省2
上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴
あと 751 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ
ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.072s