Inter-universal geometry と ABC予想 (応援スレ) 73 (698レス)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 レス栞
リロード規制です。10分ほどで解除するので、他のブラウザへ避難してください。
392(1): 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆yH25M02vWFhP [] 08/06(水)21:32 ID:umkKwTph(2/5)
さて
これ いいね ;p)
https://ivanfesenko.org/
Ivan Fesenko
https://ivanfesenko.org/?page_id=80
News – Ivan Fesenko
・About the study of IUT
https://ivanfesenko.org/wp-content/uploads/rapg-1.pdf
ABOUT THE STUDY OF IUT
IVAN FESENKO
ABSTRACT. This document presents various aspects of the study of the IUT theory of S. Mochizuki in the
period of 2012–2025. The presentation is based on first-hand knowledge and peer reviewed published papers.
P4
A Case: since 2015, Scholze, who did not have at that time and does not have now any research track
record in anabelian geometry, chose to repeatedly make public claims about some “problems” with IUT,
never providing any concrete math evidence, despite mine and other mathematicians requests. He and Stix
produced a short report in March 2018 about their take on IUT. They failed to clearly acknowledge that their
report is not about IUT but about their own oversimplified version of IUT. Their version is fundamentally
different from IUT. Their travesty of IUT easily leads to a contradiction, but this has nothing to do with
the original IUT theory. The report included no proofs but sentences such as “it seems to us”. Their
mistakes were explained in this report, this document, this relatively elementary large paper and this down
to earth large paper. After Scholze had got his award in 2018, very non-ethically he abruptly stopped all
the communication with the IUT experts. This fact leads to a natural question whether the main reason for
his aggressive ignorant behaviour towards IUT was motivated by getting math awards rather than truth. The
editors of the special volume of PRIMS containing the IUT papers were fully aware of this situation when
making their decision about the publication of the papers. In August 2023 the author of IUT made public
this short report which includes further details. Stix was listed among online participants of the 2025 IUT
workshop. Scholze’s position on IUT was taken non-critically by some mathematicians, including young
ones.
つづく
408(2): 132人目の素数さん [] 08/08(金)07:40 ID:tNu5/pw7(1)
>>404-407
>数も数えられぬ土人の国 日本
小学生が、数学わからんのに グダグダと
21世紀数学は 専門の分化が進んで 専門分野が異なると 誤解曲解になる
それが、ショルツェさんw
例えば、>>392 Ivan Fesenko さん
・About the study of IUT
https://ivanfesenko.org/wp-content/uploads/rapg-1.pdf
これの P5 Appendix 1. Preface to the special volume of PRIMS 57(2021)
IUT 論文査読で
Hireku Nakajima 土人の国で いま IMUの総裁
Masaki Kashiwara 土人の国で アーベル賞
Takuro Mochizuki 土人の国で ショック賞で3億円
小学生には 土人の国に見えるかもだが
こういう世界の一流数学者が IUTに太鼓判を押した
>轟いてないじゃんw
まあ、時間が経てば 轟きが大きくなるよ
例えば、森田同値 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%A3%AE%E7%94%B0%E5%90%8C%E5%80%A4
淡中圏 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B7%A1%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8F
米田の補題 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%B1%B3%E7%94%B0%E3%81%AE%E8%A3%9C%E9%A1%8C
Ohsawa–Takegoshi L2 extension theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohsawa%E2%80%93Takegoshi_L2_extension_theorem
ノイキルヒ・内田(遠アーベル幾何学の基本的な結果の1つである) https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%8E%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AD%E3%83%AB%E3%83%92%E3%83%BB%E5%86%85%E7%94%B0%E3%81%AE%E5%AE%9A%E7%90%86
時間が経てば 轟きが大きくなる
上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴
スレ情報 赤レス抽出 画像レス抽出 歴の未読スレ AAサムネイル
ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.035s