Inter-universal geometry と ABC予想 (応援スレ) 73 (723レス)
Inter-universal geometry と ABC予想 (応援スレ) 73 http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1753000052/
上
下
前次
1-
新
通常表示
512バイト分割
レス栞
抽出解除
レス栞
リロード規制
です。10分ほどで解除するので、
他のブラウザ
へ避難してください。
392: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆yH25M02vWFhP [] 2025/08/06(水) 21:32:07.25 ID:umkKwTph さて これ いいね ;p) https://ivanfesenko.org/ Ivan Fesenko https://ivanfesenko.org/?page_id=80 News – Ivan Fesenko ・About the study of IUT https://ivanfesenko.org/wp-content/uploads/rapg-1.pdf ABOUT THE STUDY OF IUT IVAN FESENKO ABSTRACT. This document presents various aspects of the study of the IUT theory of S. Mochizuki in the period of 2012–2025. The presentation is based on first-hand knowledge and peer reviewed published papers. P4 A Case: since 2015, Scholze, who did not have at that time and does not have now any research track record in anabelian geometry, chose to repeatedly make public claims about some “problems” with IUT, never providing any concrete math evidence, despite mine and other mathematicians requests. He and Stix produced a short report in March 2018 about their take on IUT. They failed to clearly acknowledge that their report is not about IUT but about their own oversimplified version of IUT. Their version is fundamentally different from IUT. Their travesty of IUT easily leads to a contradiction, but this has nothing to do with the original IUT theory. The report included no proofs but sentences such as “it seems to us”. Their mistakes were explained in this report, this document, this relatively elementary large paper and this down to earth large paper. After Scholze had got his award in 2018, very non-ethically he abruptly stopped all the communication with the IUT experts. This fact leads to a natural question whether the main reason for his aggressive ignorant behaviour towards IUT was motivated by getting math awards rather than truth. The editors of the special volume of PRIMS containing the IUT papers were fully aware of this situation when making their decision about the publication of the papers. In August 2023 the author of IUT made public this short report which includes further details. Stix was listed among online participants of the 2025 IUT workshop. Scholze’s position on IUT was taken non-critically by some mathematicians, including young ones. つづく http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1753000052/392
408: 132人目の素数さん [] 2025/08/08(金) 07:40:36.16 ID:tNu5/pw7 >>404-407 >数も数えられぬ土人の国 日本 小学生が、数学わからんのに グダグダと 21世紀数学は 専門の分化が進んで 専門分野が異なると 誤解曲解になる それが、ショルツェさんw 例えば、>>392 Ivan Fesenko さん ・About the study of IUT https://ivanfesenko.org/wp-content/uploads/rapg-1.pdf これの P5 Appendix 1. Preface to the special volume of PRIMS 57(2021) IUT 論文査読で Hireku Nakajima 土人の国で いま IMUの総裁 Masaki Kashiwara 土人の国で アーベル賞 Takuro Mochizuki 土人の国で ショック賞で3億円 小学生には 土人の国に見えるかもだが こういう世界の一流数学者が IUTに太鼓判を押した >轟いてないじゃんw まあ、時間が経てば 轟きが大きくなるよ 例えば、森田同値 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%A3%AE%E7%94%B0%E5%90%8C%E5%80%A4 淡中圏 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B7%A1%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8F 米田の補題 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%B1%B3%E7%94%B0%E3%81%AE%E8%A3%9C%E9%A1%8C Ohsawa–Takegoshi L2 extension theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohsawa%E2%80%93Takegoshi_L2_extension_theorem ノイキルヒ・内田(遠アーベル幾何学の基本的な結果の1つである) https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%8E%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AD%E3%83%AB%E3%83%92%E3%83%BB%E5%86%85%E7%94%B0%E3%81%AE%E5%AE%9A%E7%90%86 時間が経てば 轟きが大きくなる http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1753000052/408
メモ帳
(0/65535文字)
上
下
前次
1-
新
書
関
写
板
覧
索
設
栞
歴
スレ情報
赤レス抽出
画像レス抽出
歴の未読スレ
AAサムネイル
Google検索
Wikipedia
ぬこの手
ぬこTOP
0.020s