[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Inter-universal geometry と ABC 予想 46 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 必死ﾁｪｯｶｰ(本家) (べ) 自ID ﾚｽ栞 あぼーん

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

ﾘﾛｰﾄﾞ規制です｡10分ほどで解除するので､他のﾌﾞﾗｳｻﾞへ避難してください｡

---

33(1): 2020/04/04(土)16:28 ID:mbv9hr8e(1/2) AAS
Max Lieblich@algeom　13時間
Didn't Scholze and Stix show that the Corollary in question is wrong?

Taylor Dupuy@DupuyTaylor
They did not. The assertion they made is really really really elementary. Like its equivalent to A !=B and A=B at the same time.
There are other issues though, but we don't need a Field's Medalist to tell us this. There is a lot of appeal to authority going on here.
Twitterﾘﾝｸ:DupuyTaylor
Twitterﾘﾝｸ:5chan_nel (5ch newer account)

---

34: 2020/04/04(土)16:30 ID:mbv9hr8e(2/2) AAS
なぜ専門家でもない人より専門家に近い人の意見を信じないのかわからない。

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.027s