[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Inter-universal geometry と ABC 予想 45 (1002ﾚｽ)

Inter-universal geometry と ABC 予想 45 http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1582883006/

上下前次1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割 ﾚｽ栞
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

965: １３２人目の素数さん [sage] 2020/04/04(土) 09:33:29 ID:t13u2EPI 転載 Inter-universal geometry と ABC 予想 45 https://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1582883006/924 924 名前：１３２人目の素数さん[sage] 投稿日：2020/04/04(土) 04:30:16.20 ID:oEv2ickP [1/3] Dupuyが明確にショルツ否定してるってさ https://twitter.com/DupuyTaylor/status/1246142127538614272?s=19 Max Lieblich @algeom 6時間 返信先: @DupuyTaylor Didn't Scholze and Stix show that the Corollary in question is wrong? Taylor Dupuy @DupuyTaylor 6時間 They did not. The assertion they made is really really really elementary. Like its equivalent to A !=B and A=B at the same time. There are other issues though, but we don't need a Field's Medalist to tell us this. There is a lot of appeal to authority going on here. Max Lieblich @algeom 1時間 返信先: @DupuyTaylor I assume when you mention “appeal to authority” you also include Fesenko’s bloviating and Mochizuki’s refusal to make himself clear. （参考） Max Lieblich @algeom Professor of Mathematics at the University of Washington https://twitter.com/5chan_nel (5ch newer account) http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1582883006/965

966: １３２人目の素数さん [sage] 2020/04/04(土) 09:33:49 ID:t13u2EPI >>965 誤爆すまん http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1582883006/966

---

ﾒﾓ帳

(0/65535文字)

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

Google検索

Wikipedia

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.027s