現代数学の系譜工学物理雑談古典ガロア理論も読む77

[過去ﾛｸﾞ] 現代数学の系譜工学物理雑談古典ガロア理論も読む77 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割ﾚｽ栞
抽出解除ﾚｽ栞

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索歴削→次ｽﾚ栞削→次ｽﾚ過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

ﾘﾛｰﾄﾞ規制です｡10分ほどで解除するので､他のﾌﾞﾗｳｻﾞへ避難してください｡

38: 現代数学の系譜 雑談 古典ガロア理論も読む ◆e.a0E5TtKE  [sage] 2019/09/11(水) 14:30:28.79 ID:z0Cctf8f

>>37 補足
＞応用
＞ZFの集合モデルは集合状かつ外延的である。

”集合状”かｗ、これ意味わからんと思ったが（＾＾
”Every set model of ZF is set-like and extensional. ”の「set-like」の直訳だね（＾＾；

＜参考引用、該当英文箇所＞ (なお、Applicationも、”応用”より”適用”が適訳かもね。微妙だが)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mostowski_collapse_lemma
Mostowski collapse lemma
(抜粋)
Application
Every set model of ZF is set-like and extensional.
If the model is well-founded, then by the Mostowski collapse lemma it is isomorphic to a transitive model of ZF and such a transitive model is unique.

Saying that the membership relation of some model of ZF is well-founded is stronger than saying that the axiom of regularity is true in the model.
There exists a model M (assuming the consistency of ZF) whose domain has a subset A with no R-minimal element,
but this set A is not a "set in the model" (A is not in the domain of the model, even though all of its members are).
More precisely, for no such set A there exists x in M such that A = R^-1 [x].
So M satisfies the axiom of regularity (it is "internally" well-founded)
but it is not well-founded and the collapse lemma does not apply to it.
(引用終り)
以上

http://rio2016.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/math/1568026331/38

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

ｽﾚ情報赤ﾚｽ抽出画像ﾚｽ抽出歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

ぬこの手ぬこTOP 0.037s