[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Let's talk with Jim-san (1001ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されているため､ｷｬｯｼｭを表示しています｡過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

739(3): Jim ◆6P7QkQf8Ys 2006/07/22(土)03:46 ID:mRggU16k(17/18) AAS
>>734 and don`t you think 2 boards for controlling deletion are necessary?

---

740: Mumumu ◆MUMUMUhnYI ＠桃色吐息 ★ 2006/07/22(土)03:49 ID:??? BE AAS
I made it.
Jim-san, you can use it.

■ Jim's thinking (part 1)
2chｽﾚ:erobbs

>>739
I will reply it another writing in it sooner.

---

742: ◆IZUMI162i6 2006/07/22(土)03:57 ID:fGCb8rsD(8/11) BE AAS
>>739
If you go by the way of 2chBBS, they might be necessary.

---

743(1): Mumumu ◆MUMUMUhnYI ＠桃色吐息 ★ 2006/07/22(土)03:57 ID:??? BE AAS
>>739
I don't think so now.

Currently, 2ch and BBSPINK's deleting board is the completely same (1 unit, 3 boards).

As long-time solution, for controlling deletion of 2ch and BBSPINK may separate.
But now there are no troubles the current deletion system, so, we don't need hurry
up for separating.

Hiroyuki wants to separate these boards for 2ch and BBSPINK certainly,
but I estimates this makes very serious impacts for 2ch and BBSPINK's
deletion system.

So, I think we must not hurry. This is very difficult and needs step-by-step
省3

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 4.286s