岐阜県岐阜市　Part13

[過去ﾛｸﾞ] 岐阜県岐阜市　Part13 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割ﾚｽ栞
抽出解除ﾚｽ栞

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索歴削→次ｽﾚ栞削→次ｽﾚ過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

ﾘﾛｰﾄﾞ規制です｡10分ほどで解除するので､他のﾌﾞﾗｳｻﾞへ避難してください｡

134: 名無しさん (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 828c-L5Oy) [sage] 2022/10/27(木) 16:52:35.83 ID:cWEAc4hz0

Topic:Should the death penalty be banned in japan?
A topic like the ban of death penalty often cited in wideshows or newspapers and sparks both advocates
and opponents serious discussion. But when considering the realistic issues, some aspects obstruct the
realisation of ban of the law. And I personaly support the exstence of death penalty for maintaining the social peace.

Firstly, the law's severity contributes to the restriction of criminals. Its power would saw the seed of fear to people who
are seeking chances to commit a crime, and to some extent it deter the crime rate. Furthermore, in terms of the recrime
rate of the criminals after released from the jail, it is surely a better way to confine heinous people to secluded place until
they sentenced rather than give them opportunity to go back to the society and rechallenge towards their moralities.

Secondly, the costs of supporting a great numbers of their lives oppress the government's financial situation. If the death
penalty has diminished, this budget will bloat and get the shackle of the budget's effective distribution .

Firnally, current legislation custom that the liberal  democratic party propose an act, the opposition parties take opposite
stance tells us this extreme act realisation seems impossible.

In total, we should not determine this crutial decision to the society just only by one's personal morality matter, but approach
this with holistic views. Given the situations surrounding the theory, the death penalty would say remain as it is.

http://pug.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/tokai/1662790238/134

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

ｽﾚ情報赤ﾚｽ抽出画像ﾚｽ抽出歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

ぬこの手ぬこTOP 0.032s