[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Inter-universal geometry と ABC予想 28 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 必死ﾁｪｯｶｰ(本家) (べ) 自ID ﾚｽ栞 あぼーん

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

236(1): 2018/06/14(木)16:04 ID:VcXcAYIl(1/4) AAS
>>233

scholze(ps)の発言は2017年12月21日。
>>8

---

239(2): 2018/06/14(木)16:19 ID:VcXcAYIl(2/4) AAS
>>236
p.scholze 2017.12.21

One small thing I would like to add is that most accounts indicate that no experts have been able to point to a place where the proof would fail.
This is in fact not the case; since
shortly after the papers were out
I am pointing out that I am entirely
unable to follow the logic after
省10

---

240(1): 2018/06/14(木)16:28 ID:VcXcAYIl(3/4) AAS
>>239
つづき

Those proofs, by the way, are completely
sound, very little seems to happen in those
two papers (to me).
Since then, I have kept asking other experts
about this step, and so far did not get any
省12

---

241(2): 2018/06/14(木)16:33 ID:VcXcAYIl(4/4) AAS
>Note that this proof is in fact the *only*
proof in parts II and III that is longer than
a few lines which essentially say
This follows from the definitions”.

>in particular, no more details are given
in any survey, including Yamashita’s,
or any lectures given on the subject
省1

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.035s