英文を解説するスレ (779ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
ﾘﾛｰﾄﾞ規制です｡10分ほどで解除するので､他のﾌﾞﾗｳｻﾞへ避難してください｡
1(3): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 7360-G8JR) 06/09(月)20:34 ID:ZnawhVyT0(1/5) AAS
英文を解説するスレです。
699: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 03ac-JEiA) 08/09(土)01:20 ID:JKvjuhpL0(1/2) AAS
>>697
大家どうしたんですか
全文載せてくれませんか?
700(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 031f-JEiA) 08/09(土)23:37 ID:JKvjuhpL0(2/2) AAS
388：大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 1bc3-LeFO)：2025/08/09(土) 23:29:18.11 ID:5r9sRfef0
>>387
ﾌﾞｰｲﾓ MMf9-QkBf
おまえは俺にあこがれすぎｗ
と嘘を書くのはやめてください
701(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0ec4-htqq) 08/10(日)00:03 ID:+bg/a6vS0(1/4) AAS
認知が歪みまくってんな…
702: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f61f-CJJZ) 08/10(日)00:49 ID:wRQ81Pav0(1/2) AAS
>>701
>>700を繰り返し読め
703: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0ec4-htqq) 08/10(日)01:35 ID:+bg/a6vS0(2/4) AAS
認知が歪みまくってんな…
704(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6e5-CJJZ) 08/10(日)02:03 ID:wRQ81Pav0(2/2) AAS
>>697
炭素税をかけるのは消費者に歓迎されないから、クリーンな
物への移行に補助金を与えようというのが広く採用されるようになり、
採用後、需要が増え生産が増えてコストが下がるようになった。ゆっくりとしたペースだがそんなに補助金を出さなくても
勝手に値段が下がるようになった
705: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0ec4-htqq) 08/10(日)11:18 ID:+bg/a6vS0(3/4) AAS
承認欲求を満たすために嘘を付く大家
706: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/10(日)11:27 ID:5xhD8k5t0(1) AAS
>>704
実態はそうでも無く、
再エネの普及率が高い地域ほど電気代が高いんだよね
707: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0ec4-htqq) 08/10(日)11:38 ID:+bg/a6vS0(4/4) AAS
そりゃそうだ
再エネ電源なんてベース電源には絶対になり得ない
何故なら不安定だから
再エネ電源を維持するために、火力や水力といった別のベース電源をバックアップとして常時稼働させなければならないというアホさ
708: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 1ad3-e7Pq) 08/10(日)11:50 ID:H0CmU1KL0(1) AAS
そうそう
再エネが安上がりと主張してる人は統合コストを理解してないか無視してるかのどちらか
709(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)11:27 ID:tS83zfP10(1/8) AAS
荒らしで見辛いので整理します。
実現可能な気候政策に向けて：可能なことを実行に移す
Tackling climate change has never been a simple task. Transforming the planet’s energy system and phasing out fossil fuels—upon which billions depend—was always going to generate resistance. Yet today, the challenge seems especially daunting.
In the United States, efforts to reduce carbon emissions are being rolled back. On July 29, the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would relinquish key regulatory powers over greenhouse gases, continuing a pattern set by President Donald Trump’s administration. Meanwhile, climate science itself faces open hostility. Across the Atlantic, Europe’s response to Russia’s war in Ukraine has led to rising military expenditures, leaving fewer resources for green initiatives. Political opposition to climate policies is resurfacing, with some voters viewing emissions cuts as either too expensive or unfair. In developing nations, resentment grows over green mandates perceived as foreign impositions, often blind to local energy needs. Sensing political backlash, many corporations have gone quiet about their climate efforts, even as some continue them privately.
Despite these political headwinds, technological progress in clean energy is accelerating. Solar, wind, and battery costs continue to drop, making renewables increasingly competitive. More nations are installing green infrastructure, and the private sector is still investing in alternatives to fossil fuels. The technical capacity to decarbonize large parts of the global economy is better than ever.
But the core issue remains political. Many people feel alienated by climate targets, especially the “net zero” commitments that dominate national strategies. Some see themselves as being unfairly burdened—paying higher costs while others emit freely. The perception that China, now the world’s largest emitter, is outpacing Europe and America in emissions only deepens resentment among Western voters.
省2
710: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)11:28 ID:tS83zfP10(2/8) AAS
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
711: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)11:29 ID:tS83zfP10(3/8) AAS
In the United States, Trump’s return to the presidency may turn the country into a global outlier. While some clean energy technologies, like advanced geothermal or even fusion, enjoy bipartisan support, Trump’s broader hostility to climate policy will set back progress. As energy demand increases—especially with the rise of AI and its intensive power needs—Americans may face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
Nevertheless, most people still prefer clean air to pollution and a hopeful future over a dangerous one. These basic preferences can form the emotional backbone of climate messaging. Instead of emphasizing abstract targets or distant deadlines, policymakers should tell stories of progress, independence from fossil-fuel price shocks, and shared prosperity. Campaigns framed around tangible improvements tend to resonate better than technocratic pledges.
In that spirit, a politics grounded in the possible—rather than the ideal—can provide a more durable path forward. It allows space for both ambition and compromise. And it offers something desperately needed in today’s climate debate: hope.
712: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)11:30 ID:tS83zfP10(4/8) AAS
次の課題
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
713: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 7ff7-fD8M) 08/11(月)11:46 ID:bgG6yl1x0(1) AAS
「AI博覧会 Summer ２０２５」
東京国際フォーラムにて開催、２７日、２８日
■最新AI技術が東京国際フォーラムに集合
AI博覧会では、AIエージェントを含む最新のAIソリューションが紹介され、社会実装によるビジネスチャンスが広がります。先進的な技術の展示や講演を通じて、企業やビジネスリーダーがAI活用の最新情報を得る場となります。
ぜひご来場ください！
714: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)12:00 ID:tS83zfP10(5/8) AAS
次の課題
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
715: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)12:00 ID:tS83zfP10(6/8) AAS
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
716(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)12:01 ID:tS83zfP10(7/8) AAS
In the United States, Trump’s return to the presidency may turn the country into a global outlier. While some clean energy technologies, like advanced geothermal or even fusion, enjoy bipartisan support, Trump’s broader hostility to climate policy will set back progress. As energy demand increases—especially with the rise of AI and its intensive power needs—Americans may face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
Nevertheless, most people still prefer clean air to pollution and a hopeful future over a dangerous one. These basic preferences can form the emotional backbone of climate messaging. Instead of emphasizing abstract targets or distant deadlines, policymakers should tell stories of progress, independence from fossil-fuel price shocks, and shared prosperity. Campaigns framed around tangible improvements tend to resonate better than technocratic pledges.
In that spirit, a politics grounded in the possible—rather than the ideal—can provide a more durable path forward. It allows space for both ambition and compromise. And it offers something desperately needed in today’s climate debate: hope.
717: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)12:01 ID:tS83zfP10(8/8) AAS
次の課題
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
718: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0ece-htqq) 08/11(月)14:00 ID:QYybqBB60(1) AAS
コピペ荒らしはおのれじゃ大家
719: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 5a02-W9J6) 08/12(火)13:18 ID:qG3Cm8HO0(1/2) AAS
大家は無駄な努力をしてるな
AIに作文してもらって英語が身につくわけ無いよ
720: 08/12(火)14:07 AAS
次の課題
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
721: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 5a02-W9J6) 08/12(火)14:17 ID:qG3Cm8HO0(2/2) AAS
次の課題（笑
722: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5d-htqq) 08/12(火)14:52 ID:6+vupLJo0(1/4) AAS
前の課題をクリアしてないのに次の課題に進む時点でなんの意味もないわな
723: 08/12(火)15:38 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
省6
724: 08/12(火)15:39 AAS
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
725: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0372-e7Pq) 08/12(火)16:53 ID:IM2DxakX0(1/2) AAS
これなんか書けば自動的に次の課題始まる？テスト
726: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5d-htqq) 08/12(火)16:53 ID:6+vupLJo0(2/4) AAS
次の課題（笑）
727: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0372-e7Pq) 08/12(火)16:55 ID:IM2DxakX0(2/2) AAS
英検1級スレを焼け野原にしてくれたのはここのスレ主ですよね？
728: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5d-htqq) 08/12(火)17:06 ID:6+vupLJo0(3/4) AAS
ここのスレ主で、大家という自己愛性人格障害者ですね
729: 08/12(火)18:28 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
省6
730: 08/12(火)18:29 AAS
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
731: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5d-htqq) 08/12(火)18:46 ID:6+vupLJo0(4/4) AAS
次の課題（笑）
732: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/12(火)20:11 ID:qxsAJUI50(1/2) AAS
全然駄目
やり直しです
733: 08/12(火)22:51 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
省6
734: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 5ae9-X9gX) 08/12(火)22:51 ID:YCDJs6A70(1) AAS
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
735: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/12(火)22:53 ID:qxsAJUI50(2/2) AAS
遅いよもっと早くせんか！
ハイ、次の課題？
736: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5b-htqq) 08/13(水)11:52 ID:GChDabAH0(1/5) AAS
大家を応援して、国連スレを焼け野原にしてる (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ bb96-Tg/C) も大家の自演臭えな
思考パターンが大家と一緒
737: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/13(水)11:59 ID:dKVDthR20(1/2) AAS
大家は自分が英語板を駄目にしてる自覚無いんだな
狂人は自分自身を狂人と認識出来ないと言うから仕方ないか
738: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5b-htqq) 08/13(水)12:38 ID:GChDabAH0(2/5) AAS
自分を守る認知の歪み・自己愛フィルター！
外部ﾘﾝｸ:kinimininaru.com
（略）
しかし、自己愛者はそうはなりません。
脱価値化の対象となったターゲットを自分のゴミ箱と して扱うことがデフォルトですので、その対人スタイ ルは「I am OK, you are not OK.」です。
自分はOK、相手はダメ。
省5
739: 08/13(水)13:29 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
省9
740: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5b-htqq) 08/13(水)13:40 ID:GChDabAH0(3/5) AAS
自己愛性パーソナリティ障害：【こころ診療所吉祥寺駅前】Jr ...
外部ﾘﾝｸ[html]:kokoro-kichijoji.com
(2) 自己愛性パーソナ リティ障害とは
これは「認知などの強い偏り」 パーソナリティ 障害のうち、「自分が特別だ」というような「自己愛的な」 認知の偏りが目立つタイプのパーソ ナリティ障害です。
741: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5b-htqq) 08/13(水)14:38 ID:GChDabAH0(4/5) AAS
自分のやってることが、虚しくないのか大家はw
まともな人間なら途中でアホらしくなるもんなんだがなw
742: 08/13(水)17:05 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
省9
743: 08/13(水)17:05 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
省9
744: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/13(水)17:44 ID:dKVDthR20(2/2) AAS
次の課題が連続しとるな
意味不明な状況
745: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5b-htqq) 08/13(水)23:09 ID:GChDabAH0(5/5) AAS
もうここ大家を解説するスレで良いんじゃね？w
746: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6c1-PZ2O) 08/14(木)01:36 ID:MKjjg05A0(1/5) AAS
大家、課題やるよ。でも今日は疲れてる。
あとでやる。課題を出してくれてありがとう
747: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6c1-PZ2O) 08/14(木)06:34 ID:MKjjg05A0(2/5) AAS
>>709から。
748: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 1a27-htqq) 08/14(木)09:25 ID:w8OYbSmX0(1) AAS
コピペ荒らしを正当化するために生徒役を用意したのかwww
認知の歪みってこういうことやぞwww
749: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/14(木)09:35 ID:mcCRgqye0(1) AAS
何をやるか決まっても無いのに課題をやるも何もないだろう
750(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6c1-PZ2O) 08/14(木)09:40 ID:MKjjg05A0(3/5) AAS
大家さんはやる気がないのかsome leaders..
のところを線が入ったレコードのように繰り返している。
ここまでのところは
補助金
炭素税
日常生活に根ざす 充電センター 車を安く中国から
アメリカ
省5
751: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6c1-PZ2O) 08/14(木)09:43 ID:MKjjg05A0(4/5) AAS
>>750
は>>716までのまとめ
752: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6c1-PZ2O) 08/14(木)09:43 ID:MKjjg05A0(5/5) AAS
大家さんは新しい課題を準備してください
753(1): 08/17(日)16:14 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
省9
754: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW dbcb-jOxD) 08/17(日)21:10 ID:l8dzMKh50(1) AAS
>>753
3. CO₂削減との関係
• 政策立案者にとっては「不公平さ」を放置すると、二酸化炭素削減のための政策（例：炭素税や省エネ規制）そのものが反発されるリスクがあります。
• そのため本文の流れでは：
• 「気候対策を政治的に実現可能にするには、生活への支障を減らすことが重要」
• → 冷房の不平等を放置すると、気候政策全体への支持が揺らぐ
• → だから、CO₂削減を進めるには、公平性の確保が欠かせない
省8
755(1): 08/18(月)18:27 AAS
荒らしで見辛いので整理します。
実現可能な気候政策に向けて：可能なことを実行に移す
Tackling climate change has never been a simple task. Transforming the planet’s energy system and phasing out fossil fuels—upon which billions depend—was always going to generate resistance. Yet today, the challenge seems especially daunting.
In the United States, efforts to reduce carbon emissions are being rolled back. On July 29, the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would relinquish key regulatory powers over greenhouse gases, continuing a pattern set by President Donald Trump’s administration. Meanwhile, climate science itself faces open hostility. Across the Atlantic, Europe’s response to Russia’s war in Ukraine has led to rising military expenditures, leaving fewer resources for green initiatives. Political opposition to climate policies is resurfacing, with some voters viewing emissions cuts as either too expensive or unfair. In developing nations, resentment grows over green mandates perceived as foreign impositions, often blind to local energy needs. Sensing political backlash, many corporations have gone quiet about their climate efforts, even as some continue them privately.
Despite these political headwinds, technological progress in clean energy is accelerating. Solar, wind, and battery costs continue to drop, making renewables increasingly competitive. More nations are installing green infrastructure, and the private sector is still investing in alternatives to fossil fuels. The technical capacity to decarbonize large parts of the global economy is better than ever.
But the core issue remains political. Many people feel alienated by climate targets, especially the “net zero” commitments that dominate national strategies. Some see themselves as being unfairly burdened—paying higher costs while others emit freely. The perception that China, now the world’s largest emitter, is outpacing Europe and America in emissions only deepens resentment among Western voters.
省2
756: 08/18(月)18:28 AAS
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
757: 08/18(月)18:29 AAS
In the United States, Trump’s return to the presidency may turn the country into a global outlier. While some clean energy technologies, like advanced geothermal or even fusion, enjoy bipartisan support, Trump’s broader hostility to climate policy will set back progress. As energy demand increases—especially with the rise of AI and its intensive power needs—Americans may face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
Nevertheless, most people still prefer clean air to pollution and a hopeful future over a dangerous one. These basic preferences can form the emotional backbone of climate messaging. Instead of emphasizing abstract targets or distant deadlines, policymakers should tell stories of progress, independence from fossil-fuel price shocks, and shared prosperity. Campaigns framed around tangible improvements tend to resonate better than technocratic pledges.
In that spirit, a politics grounded in the possible—rather than the ideal—can provide a more durable path forward. It allows space for both ambition and compromise. And it offers something desperately needed in today’s climate debate: hope.
758(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW dbc2-jOxD) 08/18(月)22:34 ID:hMpvkW9C0(1) AAS
>>755
ずっと同じ記事を貼り付けてますよね
759(1): スレ主 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73d2-dC/H) 08/19(火)01:49 ID:Upra8h5D0(1) AAS
>>758
君はChatGPTに英検4級認定された人だね。
英語ができないコンプで荒らしても自分がみじめになるだけだ。
人間恥を知らなくなったら終わりだよ。
みんなが迷惑するからもう書き込まように。
English板は君のレベルじゃ無理だから他の板に行きなさい。
760(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW db95-jOxD) 08/19(火)11:05 ID:gqTwC7dC0(1) AAS
>>759
大家
761: 08/19(火)20:26 AAS
>>760
君はピエロにしか見えないよｗ
762(1): 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73c3-dC/H) 08/20(水)17:47 ID:/dJtD+QA0(1/3) AAS
荒らしで見辛いので整理します。
実現可能な気候政策に向けて：可能なことを実行に移す
Tackling climate change has never been a simple task. Transforming the planet’s energy system and phasing out fossil fuels—upon which billions depend—was always going to generate resistance. Yet today, the challenge seems especially daunting.
In the United States, efforts to reduce carbon emissions are being rolled back. On July 29, the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would relinquish key regulatory powers over greenhouse gases, continuing a pattern set by President Donald Trump’s administration. Meanwhile, climate science itself faces open hostility. Across the Atlantic, Europe’s response to Russia’s war in Ukraine has led to rising military expenditures, leaving fewer resources for green initiatives. Political opposition to climate policies is resurfacing, with some voters viewing emissions cuts as either too expensive or unfair. In developing nations, resentment grows over green mandates perceived as foreign impositions, often blind to local energy needs. Sensing political backlash, many corporations have gone quiet about their climate efforts, even as some continue them privately.
Despite these political headwinds, technological progress in clean energy is accelerating. Solar, wind, and battery costs continue to drop, making renewables increasingly competitive. More nations are installing green infrastructure, and the private sector is still investing in alternatives to fossil fuels. The technical capacity to decarbonize large parts of the global economy is better than ever.
But the core issue remains political. Many people feel alienated by climate targets, especially the “net zero” commitments that dominate national strategies. Some see themselves as being unfairly burdened—paying higher costs while others emit freely. The perception that China, now the world’s largest emitter, is outpacing Europe and America in emissions only deepens resentment among Western voters.
省2
763: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73c3-dC/H) 08/20(水)17:48 ID:/dJtD+QA0(2/3) AAS
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
764(1): 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73c3-dC/H) 08/20(水)17:50 ID:/dJtD+QA0(3/3) AAS
In the United States, Trump’s return to the presidency may turn the country into a global outlier. While some clean energy technologies, like advanced geothermal or even fusion, enjoy bipartisan support, Trump’s broader hostility to climate policy will set back progress. As energy demand increases—especially with the rise of AI and its intensive power needs—Americans may face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
Nevertheless, most people still prefer clean air to pollution and a hopeful future over a dangerous one. These basic preferences can form the emotional backbone of climate messaging. Instead of emphasizing abstract targets or distant deadlines, policymakers should tell stories of progress, independence from fossil-fuel price shocks, and shared prosperity. Campaigns framed around tangible improvements tend to resonate better than technocratic pledges.
In that spirit, a politics grounded in the possible—rather than the ideal—can provide a more durable path forward. It allows space for both ambition and compromise. And it offers something desperately needed in today’s climate debate: hope.
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
765: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW dbba-jOxD) 08/22(金)18:31 ID:mcXFCs5X0(1) AAS
>>764
その、最後の
次の課題という例文だけど、前に読んだので
多分同じ問題をコピペし続けているよね
なんでそんなことをするの?
766: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73c3-dC/H) 08/23(土)17:46 ID:q1YoZUPp0(1/2) AAS
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
stillそれでも
distort歪める
carbon pricing、カーボンプライシング、炭素価格付け
「カーボンプライシングの主な手法:
炭素税:
省14
767: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73c3-dC/H) 08/23(土)17:47 ID:q1YoZUPp0(2/2) AAS
pressure someone to do something人に〜するよう圧力をかける
受動態someone is pressured to do something
install heat pumpsヒートポンプを設置する
trained technicians訓練された技術者
switing to〜への切り替え
expanded charging infrastructure拡張された充電インフラ
affordable手頃な価格の
省4
768: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 7ac3-aDpY) 08/24(日)00:47 ID:tlx9XM3N0(1) AAS
次の課題
In the United States, Trump’s return to the presidency may turn the country into a global outlier. While some clean energy technologies, like advanced geothermal or even fusion, enjoy bipartisan support, Trump’s broader hostility to climate policy will set back progress. As energy demand increases—especially with the rise of AI and its intensive power needs—Americans may face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
769: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f64c-/y9e) 09/13(土)08:22 ID:jl/B+9qa0(1/2) AAS
>>762
を書き直してみた
Gerard Way – Fragmented / Anthem Style 🎶🖤🌍
[Verse]
Fossil fires feed the billions,
cut the cord—resistance screams.
Science burning, banners falling,
省19
770: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f64c-/y9e) 09/13(土)08:22 ID:jl/B+9qa0(2/2) AAS
[Bridge – shouted]
Stop the fire! Stop the air!
Balance poison everywhere!
Cut it deeper, make it clean—
we’re not prepared, we never were.
[Final Chorus – explosive]
Net zero! Net nothing!
省7
771: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aaad-2SvS) 09/13(土)10:49 ID:BG7iHHcs0(1/2) AAS
老害ブロックjl/B+9qa0
※このスレのルール
荒らしの老害のIDはNG登録して絶対レスしないこと。
老害は変態性欲から女性に異常なつきまといをしています。
772: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aaad-2SvS) 09/13(土)10:52 ID:BG7iHHcs0(2/2) AAS
老害消滅ｗ７６９−７７０
face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
771大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aaad-2SvS)
垢版 | 大砲
2025/09/13(土) 10:49:10.25ID:BG7iHHcs0
老害ブロックjl/B+9qa0
773: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 3fbf-RZ1l) 09/15(月)06:45 ID:T39nVriT0(1/3) AAS
Burnt Fingers: What if the $3 Trillion AI Investment Surge Turns Sour?
An Investment Boom of Historic Scale
Artificial intelligence has already become the focus of one of the largest investment waves in modern times. In 2025, major American technology firms are expected to allocate close to $400 billion to the infrastructure required for running advanced AI systems. Leading developers such as OpenAI and Anthropic continue to raise capital at breakneck speed, with their combined valuations nearing $500 billion. Analysts now forecast that, by 2028, global spending on data-center construction will surpass $3 trillion.
The amounts involved are so enormous that the obvious question arises: what happens when the bill comes due? Even if AI ultimately delivers on its potential, many investors will not see their money back. And if the technology underperforms, the fallout could be sharp and painful.
The Logic of the Race
Investors have always chased promising innovations, but the rush into AI is even more intense than many past bubbles. Optimists claim that artificial general intelligence (AGI)—systems outperforming humans across most intellectual tasks—could be only a few years away. The firm that reaches that goal first might capture rewards beyond imagination. At the same time, few investors believe they know which company or model will prevail. To move too cautiously risks being irrelevant altogether.
省1
774: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 3fbf-RZ1l) 09/15(月)06:45 ID:T39nVriT0(2/3) AAS
The Inevitable Losses
Regardless of the outcome, heavy losses are unavoidable. In the most optimistic scenario, AGI might arrive and trigger extraordinary global growth, perhaps on the order of 20% a year. Some shareholders would reap staggering profits, but many others would not.
More realistic outcomes suggest disappointment. Technologies often develop in unexpected ways. In the late 19th century, America’s electricity industry moved decisively to alternating current, leaving direct-current firms stranded. Today’s investors assume that success depends on building the largest models. Yet, early adopters are increasingly turning to smaller systems, hinting that computing intensity might not be the decisive factor.
Alternatively, adoption could proceed more slowly than projected. Technical shortcomings, difficulties in rapidly expanding electricity supply, or corporate inertia might slow things down. If earnings expectations are revised downward, financiers may pull back. The funding stream could shrink, and many start-ups might collapse under mounting losses.
If the Boom Stalls
省1
775: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 3fbf-RZ1l) 09/15(月)06:46 ID:T39nVriT0(3/3) AAS
Fortunately, the financial system is sturdier than in earlier busts. Previous technology crashes triggered banking crises, but today’s data-center boom has largely been financed by the profits of the tech giants themselves. Firms such as Meta are issuing debt to help fund new investments, but their existing cash flow and balance sheets remain strong. Private-market lenders—drawing funds from wealthy individuals and institutions—are eager to provide financing. Venture capital and sovereign-wealth funds, rather than small depositors, bear the risks tied to start-ups.
Hidden Fragilities
Still, vulnerabilities could emerge. As the wave spreads, financing structures may become riskier and weaker firms could be drawn in. Utilities, for instance, are racing to expand electricity supply for AI; a highly leveraged power company could easily overextend itself.
America’s wider economy is also at stake. One estimate suggests that AI investment alone accounted for roughly 40% of U.S. GDP growth in the past year, a striking figure for a sector that contributes only a few percent of output. If projects are cut back or abandoned, the knock-on effects—fewer data centers built and fewer jobs created—would be severe.
Market Consequences and Wealth Effects
省3
776: 378 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW ffc4-Gbth) 09/19(金)08:37 ID:AqGKsYXi0(1) AAS
老害ブロッカー使い続けてたら、自分一人のブログ状態になるよね。
他の人が同じように大家に対してブロッカーを使うから
他の人が大家に書くこともなくなるよね
そんなの望んでいるのだろうな
777: 09/19(金)10:32 AAS
老害ブロックAqGKsYXi0
※このスレのルール
荒らしの老害のIDはNG登録して絶対レスしないこと。
老害は変態性欲から女性に異常なつきまといをしています。
778: 09/19(金)20:10 AAS
インド独自のAIリーダーシップへの道
Artificial intelligence is spreading rapidly across India, but the country’s trajectory will not resemble that of the United States or China. Even so, it could emerge as a major force in the global AI landscape.
India has quickly become one of the largest markets for leading AI firms. OpenAI counts the country as its second-biggest user base, with ChatGPT enjoying hundreds of millions of active users worldwide. Anthropic, another startup, reports a similar pattern. This is partly due to India’s massive population, but it also reflects a striking eagerness to adopt digital tools. A survey by Boston Consulting Group found that more than nine in ten Indian office workers regularly rely on AI systems, compared with under two-thirds in the U.S. Public opinion, too, tends to be more optimistic: most Indians see AI’s advantages as outweighing its potential dangers.
That enthusiasm has been reinforced by aggressive pricing from foreign tech firms. OpenAI’s subscription plans in India cost only a fraction of what Americans pay. Elon Musk’s company xAI offers Grok at even steeper discounts, while Perplexity has provided free access for a year to hundreds of millions of Airtel subscribers. Such tactics have fueled explosive growth in usage.
But this surge comes with unease. Youth unemployment remains stubbornly high at about 16%, and the manufacturing sector has not created the jobs many had hoped for. Automation has already displaced some roles, and AI threatens to intensify the problem. White-collar employment faces strain as well: Tata Consultancy Services, the country’s largest IT services company, recently announced a major workforce reduction to adapt to new technologies. Analysts expect other firms to follow.
779: 09/19(金)20:11 AAS
Another concern is overreliance on foreign suppliers. Policymakers fear that India could become dependent on AI technologies developed abroad. To counter this, the government has backed Sarvam AI, a local firm, to build the country’s first indigenous foundational model.
Despite these risks, the opportunities are immense. India has already demonstrated how openness to foreign platforms can pay off. Its national payments network, handling hundreds of millions of daily transactions, is testing AI to improve fraud detection. More transformative applications are on the horizon: digital assistants could help bridge shortages of teachers and doctors, improving access to education and health care.
Although India does not produce cutting-edge models or advanced chips, it has strengths that play to its advantage. With one of the largest developer communities on GitHub and a vibrant domestic market, Indian firms are well positioned to design practical and affordable AI services. The mix of global competition and local innovation provides a fertile ground for experimentation.
Indian consumers are also shaping global AI design. Voice commands, for example, dominate usage in India, reflecting linguistic diversity and literacy challenges. Local companies excel at creating tools that serve varied users, skills that could prove influential worldwide.
India has already shown how scalable digital systems can become global templates. Its “India Stack,” a national digital identity and payments infrastructure, has inspired other countries. AI-driven products developed in India could represent the next wave of low-cost, adaptable innovations exported to the wider developing world.
省1
上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ
ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.052s