[過去ﾛｸﾞ] スレ立てるまでもない雑談スレ その6 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

ﾘﾛｰﾄﾞ規制です｡10分ほどで解除するので､他のﾌﾞﾗｳｻﾞへ避難してください｡

---

215(2): 2023/04/10(月)13:14 ID:n5Iq9HHO(3/4) AAS
The Snap sandbox heavily relies on the AppArmor Linux Security Module from the upstream Linux kernel. Because only one "major" Linux Security Module (LSM) can be active at the same time,[33] the Snap sandbox is much less secure when another major LSM is enabled. As a result, on distributions such as Fedora which enable SELinux by default, the Snap sandbox is heavily degraded. Although Canonical is working with many other developers and companies to make it possible for multiple LSMs to run at the same time, this solution is still a long time away.

外部ﾘﾝｸ:en.wikipedia.org

---

216(1): 2023/04/10(月)13:18 ID:n5Iq9HHO(4/4) AAS
>>215
Others have objected to the closed-source nature of the Snap Store. Clement Lefebvre (Linux Mint founder and project leader[82][83]) has written that Snap is biased and has a conflict of interest. The reasons he cited include it being governed by Canonical and locked to their store, and also that Snap works better on Ubuntu than on other distributions.[84] He later announced that the installing of Snap would be blocked by APT in Linux Mint,[85][86] although a way to disable this restriction would be documented.

さらには、上記みたいな批判もあるからね。リスク覚悟で使うべきだよ。

---

219(1): 2023/04/10(月)18:49 ID:nwSlI4oF(1) AAS
>>215 >>216
難しくてよくわからないわ。
1つ目は、サンドボックスのセキュリティが低い(でもサンドボックス化されていないよりはマシ？)
2つ目はSnapStoreがクローズドなのが良くない
ってことであってる？
まあ、これぐらいなら許容できるかな。

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.030s