CentOS Part 53【RHEL Clone】

[過去ﾛｸﾞ] CentOS Part 53【RHEL Clone】 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次 1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割ﾚｽ栞

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索歴削→次ｽﾚ栞削→次ｽﾚ過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

964: login:Penguin [sage] 2021/04/30(金) 21:33:55 ID:YnCMR/HV

高エネルギー物理学の研究業界は　CERN/FNAL の決定待ち
本当は2021年Q1の間（３月末まで）にアナウンスが出るはずだけど、遅れている

https://linux.web.cern.ch/centos8/
How is CERN going to adapt to this?¶

CERN acknowledges the recent decision to shift focus from CentOS Linux to CentOS Stream,
and the sudden change of the end of life of the CentOS 8 release. This may entail significant
consequences for the worldwide particle physics community. We are currently investigating
together with Fermilab the best path forward. We will keep you informed about any
developments in this area during Q1 2021.

―
Joint Fermilab/CERN statement on recent CentOS Changes
https://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind2012&L=SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS&P=65515

CERN and Fermilab acknowledge the recent decision to shift focus from CentOS Linux to
CentOS Stream, and the sudden change of the end of life of the CentOS 8 release.
This may entail significant consequences for the worldwide particle physics community.
We are currently investigating together the best path forward. We will keep you
informed about any developments in this area during Q1 2021.

James Amundson, Fermilab Scientific Computing Division Head
Elizabeth Sexton-Kennedy, Fermilab Chief Information Officer

http://mao.5ch.io/test/read.cgi/linux/1609035472/964

986: login:Penguin [sage] 2021/05/05(水) 23:25:03 ID:NC8HktFB

>>985
- there is no explanation how CentOS Stream is a technically acceptable replacement
for CentOS Linux. There is many questions here, none answered.

全くその通りで、これまでRHELのクローン（安定版）で普通に業務にも使えていたCentOSが
開発用不安定版のバクだしのための、CentOS Streamに置き換えらられるはずがない！　下にも同様のレポ。

Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:57:11 +0000
https://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind2105&L=SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS&P=6835

When the Centos 8 news came out, I tried out Centos Stream against our configuration. Kickstart and Puppet config
needed very little change and I was able to bring up a VM in our lab config quite easily.
I have two observations:

1) Updates are sparse, none for ages then a large batch of version updates.
2) Stuff can be broken and remain so for a long while. We use Podman rootless. That was broken in the version of Stream
I initially installed and remained broken for a few weeks until the next chunk of updates. I looked up the issue in the RHEL
tracker and it had been fixed quickly in Fedora etc. but this did not make it to Stream on the same timescale.

My view is that Stream is exactly what RHEL say it is, a development distribution to which 3rd parties can contribute to
RHEL development and from which 3rd parties can base their own distributions. It's not for end users, or small
organisations that need timely security updates and other fixes and can't produce same themselves.

http://mao.5ch.io/test/read.cgi/linux/1609035472/986

上下前次 1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

ｽﾚ情報赤ﾚｽ抽出画像ﾚｽ抽出歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

ぬこの手ぬこTOP 0.391s*