英文を解説するスレ (786ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
1(3): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 7360-G8JR) 06/09(月)20:34 ID:ZnawhVyT0(1/5)調 AAS
英文を解説するスレです。
687: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 1bc3-LeFO) 08/05(火)15:03 ID:sfT4I1dv0(3/3)調 AAS
次の課題
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
688: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0315-JEiA) 08/06(水)02:35 ID:sX7BTHLA0(1/4)調 AAS
環境目標は捨てたら、味方はがっかり、敵のみ勢いづく
再考して、一分を達成して良しとする現実路線が必要やで、
いやほんまやで
689: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 03bb-JEiA) 08/06(水)21:19 ID:sX7BTHLA0(2/4)調 AAS
おまえはストーカー規制法を犯している犯罪者だ。
嫌がっているのになぜ無視する？
さっさと消えろ変質者！
これが大家が国連A級スレの1000で書いた文章だ
690: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 03bb-JEiA) 08/06(水)21:20 ID:sX7BTHLA0(3/4)調 AAS
1000：正義の人大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 1bc3-LeFO)：2025/08/06(水) 20:47:25.51 ID:yXgOyDLb0
嫌がらせをしないでいただけませんか?
>大家
691: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 2b37-QowW) 08/06(水)21:39 ID:asZcbj+L0(1)調 AAS
自己愛者が「お前はストーカー規制法を犯している犯罪者だ」と言っているなら、
ほぼ間違いなくストーカー規制法を犯しているのは自己愛者自身
自己愛者が「お前は不正アクセス禁止法を犯している犯罪者だ」と言うなら、
ほぼ間違いなく不正アクセス禁止法を犯しているのは自己愛者自身
692: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 03bb-JEiA) 08/06(水)21:45 ID:sX7BTHLA0(4/4)調 AAS
大家は自分のスレに書き込みをせずに。他のスレで他人に嫌がらせを
してるけどそういうのはよくないと思うよ
>>大家
693: (ﾌﾞｰｲﾓ MMf9-QkBf) 08/07(木)05:12 ID:Y6OCLlWaM(1)調 AAS
まぁ英語板うんこだらけ
低能カスゴミクズwwwwwww
694: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 1bc3-LeFO) 08/07(木)08:42 ID:Pa8zAVHa0(1/3)調 AAS
But making rapid, deep cuts in emissions in the near term often entails economic sacrifices that many societies are not prepared to make. For countries that have yet to see emissions decline at all, achieving net zero would mean severe and abrupt changes—both physically and politically difficult to implement.
making動名詞
make cuts in〜の削減を行う
entail〜を伴う
make sacrifices犠牲を伴う
have yet to do something〜をまだしていない
yet〜 at all、まだまったく〜ない
see 目的語 原形不定詞=see emisions decline
wouldだろう
changes (that are )both physically and politically difficult to implement
difficultはchangesを後置修飾
dificult to implement実行が難しい
to implementは形容詞の範囲を限定する不定詞の副詞的用法
695: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 1bc3-LeFO) 08/07(木)08:43 ID:Pa8zAVHa0(2/3)調 AAS
次の課題
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
696: 08/07(木)10:30 AAS
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
would be counterproductive逆効果を招く、補語
wouldは推量
,disheartening environmental advocates付帯状況連続の分詞構文
そして環境擁護者のやる気をなくさせるだろう
and empowering denialists付帯状況連続の分詞構文
そして(気候変動)否定論者に力を与えるだろう
treat A as B、AをBとして扱う
flexible framework柔軟な枠組み
rigid deadlines厳格な締め切り
observe〜を述べる
As C oveserves,〜、Cが述べたように〜である
realism現実主義
697(3): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 1bc3-LeFO) 08/07(木)10:33 ID:Pa8zAVHa0(3/3)調 AAS
次の課題
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
698: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 03ac-JEiA) 08/08(金)22:15 ID:1ht0p6590(1)調 AAS
>>697
小出しにするんじゃなくてまとめて一つの記事を出してもらえませんか?
699: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 03ac-JEiA) 08/09(土)01:20 ID:JKvjuhpL0(1/2)調 AAS
>>697
大家どうしたんですか
全文載せてくれませんか?
700(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 031f-JEiA) 08/09(土)23:37 ID:JKvjuhpL0(2/2)調 AAS
388：大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 1bc3-LeFO)：2025/08/09(土) 23:29:18.11 ID:5r9sRfef0
>>387
ﾌﾞｰｲﾓ MMf9-QkBf
おまえは俺にあこがれすぎｗ
と嘘を書くのはやめてください
701(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0ec4-htqq) 08/10(日)00:03 ID:+bg/a6vS0(1/4)調 AAS
認知が歪みまくってんな…
702: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f61f-CJJZ) 08/10(日)00:49 ID:wRQ81Pav0(1/2)調 AAS
>>701
>>700を繰り返し読め
703: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0ec4-htqq) 08/10(日)01:35 ID:+bg/a6vS0(2/4)調 AAS
認知が歪みまくってんな…
704(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6e5-CJJZ) 08/10(日)02:03 ID:wRQ81Pav0(2/2)調 AAS
>>697
炭素税をかけるのは消費者に歓迎されないから、クリーンな
物への移行に補助金を与えようというのが広く採用されるようになり、
採用後、需要が増え生産が増えてコストが下がるようになった。ゆっくりとしたペースだがそんなに補助金を出さなくても
勝手に値段が下がるようになった
705: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0ec4-htqq) 08/10(日)11:18 ID:+bg/a6vS0(3/4)調 AAS
承認欲求を満たすために嘘を付く大家
706: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/10(日)11:27 ID:5xhD8k5t0(1)調 AAS
>>704
実態はそうでも無く、
再エネの普及率が高い地域ほど電気代が高いんだよね
707: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0ec4-htqq) 08/10(日)11:38 ID:+bg/a6vS0(4/4)調 AAS
そりゃそうだ
再エネ電源なんてベース電源には絶対になり得ない
何故なら不安定だから
再エネ電源を維持するために、火力や水力といった別のベース電源をバックアップとして常時稼働させなければならないというアホさ
708: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 1ad3-e7Pq) 08/10(日)11:50 ID:H0CmU1KL0(1)調 AAS
そうそう
再エネが安上がりと主張してる人は統合コストを理解してないか無視してるかのどちらか
709(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)11:27 ID:tS83zfP10(1/8)調 AAS
荒らしで見辛いので整理します。
実現可能な気候政策に向けて：可能なことを実行に移す
Tackling climate change has never been a simple task. Transforming the planet’s energy system and phasing out fossil fuels—upon which billions depend—was always going to generate resistance. Yet today, the challenge seems especially daunting.
In the United States, efforts to reduce carbon emissions are being rolled back. On July 29, the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would relinquish key regulatory powers over greenhouse gases, continuing a pattern set by President Donald Trump’s administration. Meanwhile, climate science itself faces open hostility. Across the Atlantic, Europe’s response to Russia’s war in Ukraine has led to rising military expenditures, leaving fewer resources for green initiatives. Political opposition to climate policies is resurfacing, with some voters viewing emissions cuts as either too expensive or unfair. In developing nations, resentment grows over green mandates perceived as foreign impositions, often blind to local energy needs. Sensing political backlash, many corporations have gone quiet about their climate efforts, even as some continue them privately.
Despite these political headwinds, technological progress in clean energy is accelerating. Solar, wind, and battery costs continue to drop, making renewables increasingly competitive. More nations are installing green infrastructure, and the private sector is still investing in alternatives to fossil fuels. The technical capacity to decarbonize large parts of the global economy is better than ever.
But the core issue remains political. Many people feel alienated by climate targets, especially the “net zero” commitments that dominate national strategies. Some see themselves as being unfairly burdened—paying higher costs while others emit freely. The perception that China, now the world’s largest emitter, is outpacing Europe and America in emissions only deepens resentment among Western voters.
From a scientific standpoint, the goal of net zero makes sense. Halting global warming requires the total amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to stop increasing. That can be achieved either by eliminating emissions or by removing as much as is emitted—hence the term “net zero.” Setting hard targets provides clarity and ambition, helping galvanize action.
But making rapid, deep cuts in emissions in the near term often entails economic sacrifices that many societies are not prepared to make. For countries that have yet to see emissions decline at all, achieving net zero would mean severe and abrupt changes—both physically and politically difficult to implement.
710: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)11:28 ID:tS83zfP10(2/8)調 AAS
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
711: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)11:29 ID:tS83zfP10(3/8)調 AAS
In the United States, Trump’s return to the presidency may turn the country into a global outlier. While some clean energy technologies, like advanced geothermal or even fusion, enjoy bipartisan support, Trump’s broader hostility to climate policy will set back progress. As energy demand increases—especially with the rise of AI and its intensive power needs—Americans may face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
Nevertheless, most people still prefer clean air to pollution and a hopeful future over a dangerous one. These basic preferences can form the emotional backbone of climate messaging. Instead of emphasizing abstract targets or distant deadlines, policymakers should tell stories of progress, independence from fossil-fuel price shocks, and shared prosperity. Campaigns framed around tangible improvements tend to resonate better than technocratic pledges.
In that spirit, a politics grounded in the possible—rather than the ideal—can provide a more durable path forward. It allows space for both ambition and compromise. And it offers something desperately needed in today’s climate debate: hope.
712: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)11:30 ID:tS83zfP10(4/8)調 AAS
次の課題
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
713: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 7ff7-fD8M) 08/11(月)11:46 ID:bgG6yl1x0(1)調 AAS
「AI博覧会 Summer ２０２５」
東京国際フォーラムにて開催、２７日、２８日
■最新AI技術が東京国際フォーラムに集合
AI博覧会では、AIエージェントを含む最新のAIソリューションが紹介され、社会実装によるビジネスチャンスが広がります。先進的な技術の展示や講演を通じて、企業やビジネスリーダーがAI活用の最新情報を得る場となります。
ぜひご来場ください！
714: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)12:00 ID:tS83zfP10(5/8)調 AAS
次の課題
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
715: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)12:00 ID:tS83zfP10(6/8)調 AAS
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
716(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)12:01 ID:tS83zfP10(7/8)調 AAS
In the United States, Trump’s return to the presidency may turn the country into a global outlier. While some clean energy technologies, like advanced geothermal or even fusion, enjoy bipartisan support, Trump’s broader hostility to climate policy will set back progress. As energy demand increases—especially with the rise of AI and its intensive power needs—Americans may face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
Nevertheless, most people still prefer clean air to pollution and a hopeful future over a dangerous one. These basic preferences can form the emotional backbone of climate messaging. Instead of emphasizing abstract targets or distant deadlines, policymakers should tell stories of progress, independence from fossil-fuel price shocks, and shared prosperity. Campaigns framed around tangible improvements tend to resonate better than technocratic pledges.
In that spirit, a politics grounded in the possible—rather than the ideal—can provide a more durable path forward. It allows space for both ambition and compromise. And it offers something desperately needed in today’s climate debate: hope.
717: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aac3-X9gX) 08/11(月)12:01 ID:tS83zfP10(8/8)調 AAS
次の課題
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
718: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0ece-htqq) 08/11(月)14:00 ID:QYybqBB60(1)調 AAS
コピペ荒らしはおのれじゃ大家
719: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 5a02-W9J6) 08/12(火)13:18 ID:qG3Cm8HO0(1/2)調 AAS
大家は無駄な努力をしてるな
AIに作文してもらって英語が身につくわけ無いよ
720: 08/12(火)14:07 AAS
次の課題
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
721: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 5a02-W9J6) 08/12(火)14:17 ID:qG3Cm8HO0(2/2)調 AAS
次の課題（笑
722: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5d-htqq) 08/12(火)14:52 ID:6+vupLJo0(1/4)調 AAS
前の課題をクリアしてないのに次の課題に進む時点でなんの意味もないわな
723: 08/12(火)15:38 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
These technologies are now mature enough (that) market forces alone may continue to lower their prices.
程度、結果のthat
〜形容詞 enough that〜、〜するほど十分に〜、〜なので〜
研究社英和大辞典enough、結果のthat
The economic situation was serious enough that Finland was obliged to devalue.
経済の状況は深刻だったのでフィンランドは平価切下げを余儀なくされた。
724: 08/12(火)15:39 AAS
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
725: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0372-e7Pq) 08/12(火)16:53 ID:IM2DxakX0(1/2)調 AAS
これなんか書けば自動的に次の課題始まる？テスト
726: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5d-htqq) 08/12(火)16:53 ID:6+vupLJo0(2/4)調 AAS
次の課題（笑）
727: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0372-e7Pq) 08/12(火)16:55 ID:IM2DxakX0(2/2)調 AAS
英検1級スレを焼け野原にしてくれたのはここのスレ主ですよね？
728: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5d-htqq) 08/12(火)17:06 ID:6+vupLJo0(3/4)調 AAS
ここのスレ主で、大家という自己愛性人格障害者ですね
729: 08/12(火)18:28 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
These technologies are now mature enough (that) market forces alone may continue to lower their prices.
程度、結果のthat
〜形容詞 enough that〜、〜するほど十分に〜、〜なので〜
研究社英和大辞典enough、結果のthat
The economic situation was serious enough that Finland was obliged to devalue.
経済の状況は深刻だったのでフィンランドは平価切下げを余儀なくされた。
730: 08/12(火)18:29 AAS
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
731: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5d-htqq) 08/12(火)18:46 ID:6+vupLJo0(4/4)調 AAS
次の課題（笑）
732: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/12(火)20:11 ID:qxsAJUI50(1/2)調 AAS
全然駄目
やり直しです
733: 08/12(火)22:51 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
These technologies are now mature enough (that) market forces alone may continue to lower their prices.
程度、結果のthat
〜形容詞 enough that〜、〜するほど十分に〜、〜なので〜
研究社英和大辞典enough、結果のthat
The economic situation was serious enough that Finland was obliged to devalue.
経済の状況は深刻だったのでフィンランドは平価切下げを余儀なくされた。
734: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 5ae9-X9gX) 08/12(火)22:51 ID:YCDJs6A70(1)調 AAS
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
735: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/12(火)22:53 ID:qxsAJUI50(2/2)調 AAS
遅いよもっと早くせんか！
ハイ、次の課題？
736: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5b-htqq) 08/13(水)11:52 ID:GChDabAH0(1/5)調 AAS
大家を応援して、国連スレを焼け野原にしてる (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ bb96-Tg/C) も大家の自演臭えな
思考パターンが大家と一緒
737: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/13(水)11:59 ID:dKVDthR20(1/2)調 AAS
大家は自分が英語板を駄目にしてる自覚無いんだな
狂人は自分自身を狂人と認識出来ないと言うから仕方ないか
738: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5b-htqq) 08/13(水)12:38 ID:GChDabAH0(2/5)調 AAS
自分を守る認知の歪み・自己愛フィルター！
https://kinimininaru.com/archives/3523
（略）
しかし、自己愛者はそうはなりません。
脱価値化の対象となったターゲットを自分のゴミ箱と して扱うことがデフォルトですので、その対人スタイ ルは「I am OK, you are not OK.」です。
自分はOK、相手はダメ。
むしろ、そういうことにするために事実の方を捻じ曲 げてしまいます。
（略）
自己愛者は「自分は全部良い」「悪いものは自分以外」なのです。
I am OK, you are not OK.ですね。
現実の世界と自己愛者の世界はそもそも別のものなのです。
739: 08/13(水)13:29 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
These technologies are now mature enough (that) market forces alone may continue to lower their prices.
程度、結果のthat
〜形容詞 enough that〜、〜するほど十分に〜、〜なので〜
研究社英和大辞典enough、結果のthat
The economic situation was serious enough that Finland was obliged to devalue.
経済の状況は深刻だったのでフィンランドは平価切下げを余儀なくされた。
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
740: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5b-htqq) 08/13(水)13:40 ID:GChDabAH0(3/5)調 AAS
自己愛性パーソナリティ障害：【こころ診療所吉祥寺駅前】Jr ...
https://kokoro-kichijoji.com/psychiatry/disease/npd.html
(2) 自己愛性パーソナ リティ障害とは
これは「認知などの強い偏り」 パーソナリティ 障害のうち、「自分が特別だ」というような「自己愛的な」 認知の偏りが目立つタイプのパーソ ナリティ障害です。
741: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5b-htqq) 08/13(水)14:38 ID:GChDabAH0(4/5)調 AAS
自分のやってることが、虚しくないのか大家はw
まともな人間なら途中でアホらしくなるもんなんだがなw
742: 08/13(水)17:05 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
These technologies are now mature enough (that) market forces alone may continue to lower their prices.
程度、結果のthat
〜形容詞 enough that〜、〜するほど十分に〜、〜なので〜
研究社英和大辞典enough、結果のthat
The economic situation was serious enough that Finland was obliged to devalue.
経済の状況は深刻だったのでフィンランドは平価切下げを余儀なくされた。
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
743: 08/13(水)17:05 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
These technologies are now mature enough (that) market forces alone may continue to lower their prices.
程度、結果のthat
〜形容詞 enough that〜、〜するほど十分に〜、〜なので〜
研究社英和大辞典enough、結果のthat
The economic situation was serious enough that Finland was obliged to devalue.
経済の状況は深刻だったのでフィンランドは平価切下げを余儀なくされた。
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
744: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/13(水)17:44 ID:dKVDthR20(2/2)調 AAS
次の課題が連続しとるな
意味不明な状況
745: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 0e5b-htqq) 08/13(水)23:09 ID:GChDabAH0(5/5)調 AAS
もうここ大家を解説するスレで良いんじゃね？w
746: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6c1-PZ2O) 08/14(木)01:36 ID:MKjjg05A0(1/5)調 AAS
大家、課題やるよ。でも今日は疲れてる。
あとでやる。課題を出してくれてありがとう
747: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6c1-PZ2O) 08/14(木)06:34 ID:MKjjg05A0(2/5)調 AAS
>>709から。
748: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 1a27-htqq) 08/14(木)09:25 ID:w8OYbSmX0(1)調 AAS
コピペ荒らしを正当化するために生徒役を用意したのかwww
認知の歪みってこういうことやぞwww
749: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW aa06-e7Pq) 08/14(木)09:35 ID:mcCRgqye0(1)調 AAS
何をやるか決まっても無いのに課題をやるも何もないだろう
750(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6c1-PZ2O) 08/14(木)09:40 ID:MKjjg05A0(3/5)調 AAS
大家さんはやる気がないのかsome leaders..
のところを線が入ったレコードのように繰り返している。
ここまでのところは
補助金
炭素税
日常生活に根ざす 充電センター 車を安く中国から
アメリカ
トランプー遅れ
しかしクリーンエアはいいーーバックボーン
可能なものに基づくのが良い。 ビスマルク
ambition, compromise
というふうにあらすじのキーワードを並べられる。
751: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6c1-PZ2O) 08/14(木)09:43 ID:MKjjg05A0(4/5)調 AAS
>>750
は>>716までのまとめ
752: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f6c1-PZ2O) 08/14(木)09:43 ID:MKjjg05A0(5/5)調 AAS
大家さんは新しい課題を準備してください
753(1): 08/17(日)16:14 AAS
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
adapt to〜に順応する
carbon pricing炭素の価格設定、炭素の値付け
scale back規模を縮小する
burdensome負担になる
albeit〜ではあるが
These technologies are now mature enough (that) market forces alone may continue to lower their prices.
程度、結果のthat
〜形容詞 enough that〜、〜するほど十分に〜、〜なので〜
研究社英和大辞典enough、結果のthat
The economic situation was serious enough that Finland was obliged to devalue.
経済の状況は深刻だったのでフィンランドは平価切下げを余儀なくされた。
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
754: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW dbcb-jOxD) 08/17(日)21:10 ID:l8dzMKh50(1)調 AAS
>>753
3. CO₂削減との関係
• 政策立案者にとっては「不公平さ」を放置すると、二酸化炭素削減のための政策（例：炭素税や省エネ規制）そのものが反発されるリスクがあります。
• そのため本文の流れでは：
• 「気候対策を政治的に実現可能にするには、生活への支障を減らすことが重要」
• → 冷房の不平等を放置すると、気候政策全体への支持が揺らぐ
• → だから、CO₂削減を進めるには、公平性の確保が欠かせない
⸻
4. 政策の方向性
• 単純に「冷房を禁止・制限」するのではなく、
• 再生可能エネルギーで賄う
• 高効率の冷房設備を普及させる
• 公共施設や弱者への補助を充実させる
といった「公正で持続可能な適応策」を組み込むことが、CO₂削減の政治的・社会的な成功につながります。
こういうことだね。ルペンのところね
755(1): 08/18(月)18:27 AAS
荒らしで見辛いので整理します。
実現可能な気候政策に向けて：可能なことを実行に移す
Tackling climate change has never been a simple task. Transforming the planet’s energy system and phasing out fossil fuels—upon which billions depend—was always going to generate resistance. Yet today, the challenge seems especially daunting.
In the United States, efforts to reduce carbon emissions are being rolled back. On July 29, the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would relinquish key regulatory powers over greenhouse gases, continuing a pattern set by President Donald Trump’s administration. Meanwhile, climate science itself faces open hostility. Across the Atlantic, Europe’s response to Russia’s war in Ukraine has led to rising military expenditures, leaving fewer resources for green initiatives. Political opposition to climate policies is resurfacing, with some voters viewing emissions cuts as either too expensive or unfair. In developing nations, resentment grows over green mandates perceived as foreign impositions, often blind to local energy needs. Sensing political backlash, many corporations have gone quiet about their climate efforts, even as some continue them privately.
Despite these political headwinds, technological progress in clean energy is accelerating. Solar, wind, and battery costs continue to drop, making renewables increasingly competitive. More nations are installing green infrastructure, and the private sector is still investing in alternatives to fossil fuels. The technical capacity to decarbonize large parts of the global economy is better than ever.
But the core issue remains political. Many people feel alienated by climate targets, especially the “net zero” commitments that dominate national strategies. Some see themselves as being unfairly burdened—paying higher costs while others emit freely. The perception that China, now the world’s largest emitter, is outpacing Europe and America in emissions only deepens resentment among Western voters.
From a scientific standpoint, the goal of net zero makes sense. Halting global warming requires the total amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to stop increasing. That can be achieved either by eliminating emissions or by removing as much as is emitted—hence the term “net zero.” Setting hard targets provides clarity and ambition, helping galvanize action.
But making rapid, deep cuts in emissions in the near term often entails economic sacrifices that many societies are not prepared to make. For countries that have yet to see emissions decline at all, achieving net zero would mean severe and abrupt changes—both physically and politically difficult to implement.
756: 08/18(月)18:28 AAS
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
757: 08/18(月)18:29 AAS
In the United States, Trump’s return to the presidency may turn the country into a global outlier. While some clean energy technologies, like advanced geothermal or even fusion, enjoy bipartisan support, Trump’s broader hostility to climate policy will set back progress. As energy demand increases—especially with the rise of AI and its intensive power needs—Americans may face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
Nevertheless, most people still prefer clean air to pollution and a hopeful future over a dangerous one. These basic preferences can form the emotional backbone of climate messaging. Instead of emphasizing abstract targets or distant deadlines, policymakers should tell stories of progress, independence from fossil-fuel price shocks, and shared prosperity. Campaigns framed around tangible improvements tend to resonate better than technocratic pledges.
In that spirit, a politics grounded in the possible—rather than the ideal—can provide a more durable path forward. It allows space for both ambition and compromise. And it offers something desperately needed in today’s climate debate: hope.
758(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW dbc2-jOxD) 08/18(月)22:34 ID:hMpvkW9C0(1)調 AAS
>>755
ずっと同じ記事を貼り付けてますよね
759(1): スレ主 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73d2-dC/H) 08/19(火)01:49 ID:Upra8h5D0(1)調 AAS
>>758
君はChatGPTに英検4級認定された人だね。
英語ができないコンプで荒らしても自分がみじめになるだけだ。
人間恥を知らなくなったら終わりだよ。
みんなが迷惑するからもう書き込まように。
English板は君のレベルじゃ無理だから他の板に行きなさい。
760(1): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW db95-jOxD) 08/19(火)11:05 ID:gqTwC7dC0(1)調 AAS
>>759
大家
761: 08/19(火)20:26 AAS
>>760
君はピエロにしか見えないよｗ
762(1): 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73c3-dC/H) 08/20(水)17:47 ID:/dJtD+QA0(1/3)調 AAS
荒らしで見辛いので整理します。
実現可能な気候政策に向けて：可能なことを実行に移す
Tackling climate change has never been a simple task. Transforming the planet’s energy system and phasing out fossil fuels—upon which billions depend—was always going to generate resistance. Yet today, the challenge seems especially daunting.
In the United States, efforts to reduce carbon emissions are being rolled back. On July 29, the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would relinquish key regulatory powers over greenhouse gases, continuing a pattern set by President Donald Trump’s administration. Meanwhile, climate science itself faces open hostility. Across the Atlantic, Europe’s response to Russia’s war in Ukraine has led to rising military expenditures, leaving fewer resources for green initiatives. Political opposition to climate policies is resurfacing, with some voters viewing emissions cuts as either too expensive or unfair. In developing nations, resentment grows over green mandates perceived as foreign impositions, often blind to local energy needs. Sensing political backlash, many corporations have gone quiet about their climate efforts, even as some continue them privately.
Despite these political headwinds, technological progress in clean energy is accelerating. Solar, wind, and battery costs continue to drop, making renewables increasingly competitive. More nations are installing green infrastructure, and the private sector is still investing in alternatives to fossil fuels. The technical capacity to decarbonize large parts of the global economy is better than ever.
But the core issue remains political. Many people feel alienated by climate targets, especially the “net zero” commitments that dominate national strategies. Some see themselves as being unfairly burdened—paying higher costs while others emit freely. The perception that China, now the world’s largest emitter, is outpacing Europe and America in emissions only deepens resentment among Western voters.
From a scientific standpoint, the goal of net zero makes sense. Halting global warming requires the total amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to stop increasing. That can be achieved either by eliminating emissions or by removing as much as is emitted—hence the term “net zero.” Setting hard targets provides clarity and ambition, helping galvanize action.
But making rapid, deep cuts in emissions in the near term often entails economic sacrifices that many societies are not prepared to make. For countries that have yet to see emissions decline at all, achieving net zero would mean severe and abrupt changes—both physically and politically difficult to implement.
763: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73c3-dC/H) 08/20(水)17:48 ID:/dJtD+QA0(2/3)調 AAS
When a goal fails to win broad support, it needs rethinking. Simply abandoning climate targets would be counterproductive, disheartening environmental advocates and empowering denialists. A better approach might be to treat these targets as flexible frameworks rather than rigid deadlines. As the 19th-century German statesman Otto von Bismarck once observed, politics is “the art of the possible.” Climate strategy must reflect that realism.
Some leaders are adapting to this logic. In Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney—a former central banker—recognizes that taxing carbon is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. Yet because carbon pricing can be unpopular, especially when it directly affects consumers, his government has scaled back its more burdensome elements.
Many governments have turned to subsidies to drive the clean transition. In some cases, this has worked well. Incentives for wind, solar, and batteries have stimulated demand, boosted production, and driven costs lower. These technologies are now mature enough that market forces alone may continue to lower their prices. Even without robust federal climate support, the United States will likely see emissions continue to fall, albeit at a slower pace.
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
764(1): 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73c3-dC/H) 08/20(水)17:50 ID:/dJtD+QA0(3/3)調 AAS
In the United States, Trump’s return to the presidency may turn the country into a global outlier. While some clean energy technologies, like advanced geothermal or even fusion, enjoy bipartisan support, Trump’s broader hostility to climate policy will set back progress. As energy demand increases—especially with the rise of AI and its intensive power needs—Americans may face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
Nevertheless, most people still prefer clean air to pollution and a hopeful future over a dangerous one. These basic preferences can form the emotional backbone of climate messaging. Instead of emphasizing abstract targets or distant deadlines, policymakers should tell stories of progress, independence from fossil-fuel price shocks, and shared prosperity. Campaigns framed around tangible improvements tend to resonate better than technocratic pledges.
In that spirit, a politics grounded in the possible—rather than the ideal—can provide a more durable path forward. It allows space for both ambition and compromise. And it offers something desperately needed in today’s climate debate: hope.
次の課題
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
765: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW dbba-jOxD) 08/22(金)18:31 ID:mcXFCs5X0(1)調 AAS
>>764
その、最後の
次の課題という例文だけど、前に読んだので
多分同じ問題をコピペし続けているよね
なんでそんなことをするの?
766: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73c3-dC/H) 08/23(土)17:46 ID:q1YoZUPp0(1/2)調 AAS
Still, subsidies can distort markets and often reduce emissions less efficiently than carbon pricing. Policymakers should eliminate subsidies that encourage fossil fuel consumption, while introducing carbon pricing mechanisms in ways that minimize direct burdens on consumers.
Efforts to make climate action more politically viable should focus on reducing the disruption it causes to everyday life. For example, people should not be pressured to install heat pumps if there are not enough trained technicians. Switching to electric vehicles should be made easier through expanded charging infrastructure and imports of affordable EVs from places like China. Climate adaptation strategies should also reflect public concerns. French populist Marine Le Pen recently resonated with voters by criticizing the inequality of access to air conditioning during heat waves.
stillそれでも
distort歪める
carbon pricing、カーボンプライシング、炭素価格付け
「カーボンプライシングの主な手法:
炭素税:
化石燃料の使用量やCO2排出量に応じて課税する制度
排出量取引制度:
企業ごとに排出量の上限を設け、上限を超えた排出は他の企業から排出枠を購入する必要がある制度
インターナルカーボンプライシング:
企業が自主的に社内の事業活動におけるCO2排出量に価格を設定し、投資判断などに活用する制度」
while introducing分詞構文付帯状況
minimize最小限にする
efforts to do sometning〜する努力、不定詞形容詞的用法
climate action気候変動対策
make OC= make climate action more politically viable
viable実現可能な
気候変動対策をもっと政治的に実現可能にする(努力)
disruption混乱
it=climate action
767: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 73c3-dC/H) 08/23(土)17:47 ID:q1YoZUPp0(2/2)調 AAS
pressure someone to do something人に〜するよう圧力をかける
受動態someone is pressured to do something
install heat pumpsヒートポンプを設置する
trained technicians訓練された技術者
switing to〜への切り替え
expanded charging infrastructure拡張された充電インフラ
affordable手頃な価格の
Climate adaptation strategies気候変動への適応戦略→気候変動による影響を 回避・軽減・受け入れるための取り組み
resonate with〜の共感を呼ぶ
air conditioning冷房
heat waves長期間の猛暑
768: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 7ac3-aDpY) 08/24(日)00:47 ID:tlx9XM3N0(1)調 AAS
次の課題
In the United States, Trump’s return to the presidency may turn the country into a global outlier. While some clean energy technologies, like advanced geothermal or even fusion, enjoy bipartisan support, Trump’s broader hostility to climate policy will set back progress. As energy demand increases—especially with the rise of AI and its intensive power needs—Americans may face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
769: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f64c-/y9e) 09/13(土)08:22 ID:jl/B+9qa0(1/2)調 AAS
>>762
を書き直してみた
Gerard Way – Fragmented / Anthem Style 🎶🖤🌍
[Verse]
Fossil fires feed the billions,
cut the cord—resistance screams.
Science burning, banners falling,
America tears apart the seams.
Across the ocean, guns take green,
every soldier fuels the machine.
Corporations whisper low,
climate vows they’ll never show.
[Chorus]
Net zero! Net nothing!
We choke while the towers rise.
Net zero! Net hollow!
A promise wrapped in lies.
[Verse]
Solar sings, the turbines spin,
a cheaper hymn in the howling wind.
But politics drags the body down,
a parasite in every town.
China running, West resents,
voters bleed to pay the rent.
Targets carved into our skin,
tell me where the end begins.
770: (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW f64c-/y9e) 09/13(土)08:22 ID:jl/B+9qa0(2/2)調 AAS
[Bridge – shouted]
Stop the fire! Stop the air!
Balance poison everywhere!
Cut it deeper, make it clean—
we’re not prepared, we never were.
[Final Chorus – explosive]
Net zero! Net nothing!
The burden’s never shared.
Net zero! Net hollow!
We burn because we’re scared.
Net zero! Net zero!
The sky becomes the grave.
Net zero! Net zero!
No one left to save.
771: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aaad-2SvS) 09/13(土)10:49 ID:BG7iHHcs0(1/2)調 AAS
老害ブロックjl/B+9qa0
※このスレのルール
荒らしの老害のIDはNG登録して絶対レスしないこと。
老害は変態性欲から女性に異常なつきまといをしています。
772: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aaad-2SvS) 09/13(土)10:52 ID:BG7iHHcs0(2/2)調 AAS
老害消滅ｗ７６９−７７０
face higher prices and stalled investment in renewables. Ambitions to build a competitive American green industry could falter.
771大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ aaad-2SvS)
垢版 | 大砲
2025/09/13(土) 10:49:10.25ID:BG7iHHcs0
老害ブロックjl/B+9qa0
773: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 3fbf-RZ1l) 09/15(月)06:45 ID:T39nVriT0(1/3)調 AAS
Burnt Fingers: What if the $3 Trillion AI Investment Surge Turns Sour?
An Investment Boom of Historic Scale
Artificial intelligence has already become the focus of one of the largest investment waves in modern times. In 2025, major American technology firms are expected to allocate close to $400 billion to the infrastructure required for running advanced AI systems. Leading developers such as OpenAI and Anthropic continue to raise capital at breakneck speed, with their combined valuations nearing $500 billion. Analysts now forecast that, by 2028, global spending on data-center construction will surpass $3 trillion.
The amounts involved are so enormous that the obvious question arises: what happens when the bill comes due? Even if AI ultimately delivers on its potential, many investors will not see their money back. And if the technology underperforms, the fallout could be sharp and painful.
The Logic of the Race
Investors have always chased promising innovations, but the rush into AI is even more intense than many past bubbles. Optimists claim that artificial general intelligence (AGI)—systems outperforming humans across most intellectual tasks—could be only a few years away. The firm that reaches that goal first might capture rewards beyond imagination. At the same time, few investors believe they know which company or model will prevail. To move too cautiously risks being irrelevant altogether.
That logic has fueled an all-out arms race. Technology giants are pouring money into computing capacity for ever-larger models. Ancillary industries—from real estate developers to electricity suppliers—are being pulled in as well. Oracle, for example, recently reported bold expectations for its AI-related cloud division, sending its stock surging and briefly lifting its founder Larry Ellison to the top of the global wealth rankings.
774: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 3fbf-RZ1l) 09/15(月)06:45 ID:T39nVriT0(2/3)調 AAS
The Inevitable Losses
Regardless of the outcome, heavy losses are unavoidable. In the most optimistic scenario, AGI might arrive and trigger extraordinary global growth, perhaps on the order of 20% a year. Some shareholders would reap staggering profits, but many others would not.
More realistic outcomes suggest disappointment. Technologies often develop in unexpected ways. In the late 19th century, America’s electricity industry moved decisively to alternating current, leaving direct-current firms stranded. Today’s investors assume that success depends on building the largest models. Yet, early adopters are increasingly turning to smaller systems, hinting that computing intensity might not be the decisive factor.
Alternatively, adoption could proceed more slowly than projected. Technical shortcomings, difficulties in rapidly expanding electricity supply, or corporate inertia might slow things down. If earnings expectations are revised downward, financiers may pull back. The funding stream could shrink, and many start-ups might collapse under mounting losses.
If the Boom Stalls
A slowdown would expose the fragility of much of today’s expenditure. After Britain’s railway mania in the 19th century, its tunnels and tracks still served passengers for generations. The fiber-optic networks laid during the dot-com era continue to transmit data today. By contrast, the AI surge may leave behind far less lasting value. The shells of data centers and expanded power capacity could be repurposed, but most spending has gone into servers and specialized chips, which quickly become outdated.
775: 大家 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 3fbf-RZ1l) 09/15(月)06:46 ID:T39nVriT0(3/3)調 AAS
Fortunately, the financial system is sturdier than in earlier busts. Previous technology crashes triggered banking crises, but today’s data-center boom has largely been financed by the profits of the tech giants themselves. Firms such as Meta are issuing debt to help fund new investments, but their existing cash flow and balance sheets remain strong. Private-market lenders—drawing funds from wealthy individuals and institutions—are eager to provide financing. Venture capital and sovereign-wealth funds, rather than small depositors, bear the risks tied to start-ups.
Hidden Fragilities
Still, vulnerabilities could emerge. As the wave spreads, financing structures may become riskier and weaker firms could be drawn in. Utilities, for instance, are racing to expand electricity supply for AI; a highly leveraged power company could easily overextend itself.
America’s wider economy is also at stake. One estimate suggests that AI investment alone accounted for roughly 40% of U.S. GDP growth in the past year, a striking figure for a sector that contributes only a few percent of output. If projects are cut back or abandoned, the knock-on effects—fewer data centers built and fewer jobs created—would be severe.
Market Consequences and Wealth Effects
Stock-market declines would magnify the damage. Because valuations of AI-linked companies have soared, investors’ portfolios are now heavily concentrated in a small set of technology giants. Households also hold more equities than they did in 2000. A downturn would erode confidence and consumer spending. The poorest households would feel little direct effect, as they own few stocks, but affluent families—whose spending has propped up U.S. consumption—would rein in outlays. Combined with tariffs and elevated interest rates, the loss of this support would sap the economy’s strength.
The Larger Lesson
The bigger the boom, the bigger the risks when momentum falters. If AI ultimately delivers on the extravagant promises made for it, the world will enter a new economic chapter. Yet the story of the feverish pursuit of that dream—whether triumphant or tragic—will itself become part of history.
776: 378 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW ffc4-Gbth) 09/19(金)08:37 ID:AqGKsYXi0(1)調 AAS
老害ブロッカー使い続けてたら、自分一人のブログ状態になるよね。
他の人が同じように大家に対してブロッカーを使うから
他の人が大家に書くこともなくなるよね
そんなの望んでいるのだろうな
777: 09/19(金)10:32 AAS
老害ブロックAqGKsYXi0
※このスレのルール
荒らしの老害のIDはNG登録して絶対レスしないこと。
老害は変態性欲から女性に異常なつきまといをしています。
778(1): 09/19(金)20:10 AAS
インド独自のAIリーダーシップへの道
Artificial intelligence is spreading rapidly across India, but the country’s trajectory will not resemble that of the United States or China. Even so, it could emerge as a major force in the global AI landscape.
India has quickly become one of the largest markets for leading AI firms. OpenAI counts the country as its second-biggest user base, with ChatGPT enjoying hundreds of millions of active users worldwide. Anthropic, another startup, reports a similar pattern. This is partly due to India’s massive population, but it also reflects a striking eagerness to adopt digital tools. A survey by Boston Consulting Group found that more than nine in ten Indian office workers regularly rely on AI systems, compared with under two-thirds in the U.S. Public opinion, too, tends to be more optimistic: most Indians see AI’s advantages as outweighing its potential dangers.
That enthusiasm has been reinforced by aggressive pricing from foreign tech firms. OpenAI’s subscription plans in India cost only a fraction of what Americans pay. Elon Musk’s company xAI offers Grok at even steeper discounts, while Perplexity has provided free access for a year to hundreds of millions of Airtel subscribers. Such tactics have fueled explosive growth in usage.
But this surge comes with unease. Youth unemployment remains stubbornly high at about 16%, and the manufacturing sector has not created the jobs many had hoped for. Automation has already displaced some roles, and AI threatens to intensify the problem. White-collar employment faces strain as well: Tata Consultancy Services, the country’s largest IT services company, recently announced a major workforce reduction to adapt to new technologies. Analysts expect other firms to follow.
779: 09/19(金)20:11 AAS
Another concern is overreliance on foreign suppliers. Policymakers fear that India could become dependent on AI technologies developed abroad. To counter this, the government has backed Sarvam AI, a local firm, to build the country’s first indigenous foundational model.
Despite these risks, the opportunities are immense. India has already demonstrated how openness to foreign platforms can pay off. Its national payments network, handling hundreds of millions of daily transactions, is testing AI to improve fraud detection. More transformative applications are on the horizon: digital assistants could help bridge shortages of teachers and doctors, improving access to education and health care.
Although India does not produce cutting-edge models or advanced chips, it has strengths that play to its advantage. With one of the largest developer communities on GitHub and a vibrant domestic market, Indian firms are well positioned to design practical and affordable AI services. The mix of global competition and local innovation provides a fertile ground for experimentation.
Indian consumers are also shaping global AI design. Voice commands, for example, dominate usage in India, reflecting linguistic diversity and literacy challenges. Local companies excel at creating tools that serve varied users, skills that could prove influential worldwide.
India has already shown how scalable digital systems can become global templates. Its “India Stack,” a national digital identity and payments infrastructure, has inspired other countries. AI-driven products developed in India could represent the next wave of low-cost, adaptable innovations exported to the wider developing world.
India’s path will differ from that of established superpowers, but its impact could be just as significant. For billions in poorer countries, the way AI evolves may depend less on Washington or Beijing than on choices made in New Delhi.
780: 378 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 862f-us5X) 09/21(日)19:07 ID:xop+Hhbx0(1/2)調 AAS
>>778
面白かった。ありがとう。
住み家を売るのはお金がないからですか?
大変ですね
781: 378 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 862f-us5X) 09/21(日)21:09 ID:xop+Hhbx0(2/2)調 AAS
インドってAIのユーザーとしての存在がでかいんだけど、
AIサービスの買い手であって、売り手ではないんだよね。
ただそれやって海外依存続けるのも不安だから国内産のAI
を作ろうともしてる。またAIサービスを使って作ったインド国内用応用サービスというのはたくさん出てて、たとえば国内で多言語の国なので、通訳、翻訳のサービスとかあって、
グローバル化の時代だから発展途上国で使われるかもね
というのはあるよね。
という内容でしたね
782: 09/21(日)23:12 AAS
Utilitarianism – Chapter I: General Remarks
Philosophers have long struggled with one of the most fundamental questions in human thought: what is the ultimate standard of right and wrong? Since the earliest days of philosophy, the search for the summum bonum, or the highest good, has divided thinkers into rival camps. For over two thousand years, disputes over morality have continued with little sign of resolution. Socrates himself, in Plato’s dialogues, is presented as defending a proto-utilitarian position against Protagoras and the prevailing moral traditions. Even today, humanity has not reached consensus, and the controversy persists much as it did in ancient Greece.
This lack of agreement on first principles is not unique to ethics. In fact, every science has faced confusion at its foundations, even mathematics, the discipline most commonly thought of as certain. Many of the so-called axioms or “first principles” of mathematics, as they have been historically taught, contain fictions and abstractions that are not strictly accurate. Yet these imperfections have not undermined the reliability of mathematical conclusions, because the strength of a science often lies not in its supposed foundations but in the body of its established results. First principles are better understood as the roots of a tree: unseen but nourishing. Theories often emerge after detailed truths have already been discovered, not before them.
Morality, however, differs from pure science. It is not just a theoretical pursuit but a practical art, intended to guide human conduct. Every human action aims at some end, and rules of conduct are meaningful only insofar as they help secure that end. Thus, unlike mathematics, where specific truths may precede general axioms, in ethics one would expect clarity about the ultimate goal to come first. A clear idea of what constitutes the good ought to shape our rules of behavior from the outset. Without such an idea, our moral rules risk being inconsistent or directionless.
One way to avoid the problem has been to appeal to a supposed natural moral sense or instinct, which is said to inform people directly of right and wrong. But this theory proves unsatisfactory. First, the very existence of such a faculty is disputed. Second, even among those who accept it, serious thinkers have abandoned the notion that it works like ordinary senses, perceiving moral truths in specific situations. Instead, they regard it as a part of reason, capable only of providing general moral principles, not of judging every case directly. Thus, whether one accepts an intuitive view of morality or an inductive one, both camps agree that general laws are essential, and individual moral judgments must be derived from them.
783: 09/21(日)23:19 AAS
The disagreement lies in the source of these general laws. Intuitionists argue that the principles of morality are self-evident truths, requiring only clear understanding to be accepted. Empiricists, by contrast, maintain that right and wrong, like truth and falsehood, must be discovered through observation and experience. Both sides nevertheless insist that morality must rest on principles, and many intuitionists concede the existence of a genuine science of morals. Yet in practice, intuitionists rarely provide a systematic list of self-evident moral principles, nor do they show how those principles relate to one another. Often, they simply elevate common moral rules to the status of axioms, or else propose vague generalities that inspire little conviction. Without a clear, single foundation, or at least a clear order of precedence among principles, their system lacks coherence.
This failure has consequences. Without an acknowledged standard, ethical theories have too often merely consecrated prevailing sentiments rather than guiding or correcting them. Yet even so, the moral beliefs of humankind have not been entirely chaotic. Their relative consistency has been due, often unconsciously, to the influence of a principle never fully recognized: the principle of utility, or the “greatest happiness” principle, later articulated most forcefully by Jeremy Bentham. People’s moral sentiments are strongly shaped by their views of what promotes or diminishes human happiness, and so utilitarian considerations have silently guided moral development even when denied in theory. No school of thought entirely rejects the relevance of consequences for happiness; most admit that such considerations are central in many moral contexts, even if they resist acknowledging them as the ultimate foundation of morality.
Indeed, utilitarian reasoning is indispensable even for moral philosophers who claim to rely on a priori principles. When pressed to justify their doctrines, they often fall back on arguments about human welfare. Take, for example, Immanuel Kant, one of the most influential advocates of an a priori foundation for morality. In his Metaphysics of Ethics, Kant presents the categorical imperative: “Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” This is intended as a supreme principle of moral obligation. But when Kant attempts to derive actual duties from it, he struggles. He does not show that immoral rules are logically impossible as universal laws; he only shows that their universal adoption would lead to consequences no one would choose to endure. In practice, then, even Kant relies on a form of utilitarian reasoning, though without acknowledging it.
784: 09/21(日)23:20 AAS
The goal of the present inquiry, therefore, is not to refute every competing moral theory, but to clarify and defend the utilitarian doctrine itself. Utilitarianism, or the “happiness principle,” holds that the ultimate end of human action, and the basis for moral judgment, is the promotion of happiness and the reduction of suffering. Yet the doctrine faces misunderstanding. Many critics reject it without having a clear idea of what it actually means. Thus, the first step must be to explain the principle carefully, distinguishing it from misrepresentations and addressing objections rooted in misconception.
Before turning to that clarification, however, it is important to note the limits of proof in moral philosophy. Questions about ultimate ends cannot be proven in the ordinary sense. We can prove that medicine is good by showing that it promotes health, or that music is good because it gives pleasure. But how can one prove that health itself is good, or that pleasure itself is desirable? These are ultimate ends; they are not justified by appeal to something beyond themselves. If one offers a formula claiming to include all intrinsic goods, that formula may be accepted or rejected, but it is not subject to proof in the common sense of the word.
Still, this does not mean the matter is beyond rational discussion. There is a broader sense of proof, one that applies to disputes in philosophy. The rational faculty can consider arguments and evidence, weigh reasons for acceptance or rejection, and arrive at a conclusion that commands intellectual assent. In this sense, utilitarianism is as capable of proof as other philosophical doctrines. Arguments can be marshaled to persuade the mind, and these constitute proof in the philosophical sense.
785(1): 09/21(日)23:20 AAS
Thus, the task ahead is twofold. First, to clear away misunderstandings about utilitarianism, showing what it really asserts and what it does not. Second, to provide the best rational grounds available for accepting it as the true foundation of morality. Only then can it be properly evaluated, not as a caricature, but as a serious philosophical doctrine. To this end, the coming discussion will begin by illustrating the principle itself, making its meaning precise and countering false objections. Once the doctrine is properly understood, its philosophical justification can be examined.
786: 378 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲW 86c3-us5X) 09/23(火)00:58 ID:VyqnY6X40(1)調 AAS
>>785だけちょろっと読んだけど、なんかよーわからんものを書いてるなという印象やで。
読んでみるけど当てにせんといてな。なんかにわかに忙しいんや
上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ
ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.023s