ゆかと一緒に踊ろう！(´・ω・`)?

ゆかと一緒に踊ろう！(´・ω・`)? (9ﾚｽ)
上下前次 1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割ﾚｽ栞

5: 夢見る名無しさん [sage] 2025/07/15(火) 13:14:50.65 ID:0

@redwine was right about the Viet reference populations being off on Tungus_Altaic and Austronesian; they're accurate in terms of predicting where Kinh Vietnamese typically plot on the global PCA though. Non-Hoa Viets are shifted away from the South Chinese on the PCA due to being 1-3% South_Indian, but aside from the Hmong and the more "pure Austronesian" Filipinos they're the most autosomally "CJK East Asian" SE Asians.
@tsakhur and @sage75 are both right about Filipinos' autosomal DNA. Filipinos are more Australoid and Melano_Polynesian admixed than Mainland SE Asians but most are at least 90% East Eurasian. The ones with native-sounding names tend to score higher on Austronesian; some score over 60%. I'm guessing the Filipinos scoring more than 10% Tungus_Altaic are Chinese mixed. Many are Hispanic/LatinAm mixed and can score 3-5% European/Amerindian/SSA.
Cambodians and Nusantarans are further away from the "CJK East Asian" cluster on the PCA than Filipinos. Autosomally Indonesians seem to be an hybrid of Filipinos and Cambodians, albeit slightly shifted towards Papuans and Melanesians.
Most Thais, Laotians, Cambodians, Burmese, and West Malaysians/Indonesians score 10-15% "South_Indian"/ASI, which is a significant amount of non-"Mongoloid" admixture. Even Vietnamese and Filipinos tend to score 2-3% "South_Indian" (Filipinos also typically score 2-5% "Australoid" + "Melano_Polynesian"). The only East Asians who commonly scored more than ~1% on any of those components are a few of the Japanese samples, which likely reflects the calculator picking up on Jomon-derived SNPs that are exclusive to Japanese.

http://medaka.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/yume/1744913470/5

上下前次 1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

ｽﾚ情報赤ﾚｽ抽出画像ﾚｽ抽出歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

ぬこの手ぬこTOP 0.257s*