[過去ﾛｸﾞ]
Let's talk with Jim-san. Part2 (837ﾚｽ)
上
下
前
次
1-
新
このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索
歴削→次ｽﾚ
栞削→次ｽﾚ
過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ
151
: 2006/07/31(月) 14:38:31
ID:Sb043K9s(1)
調
AA×
外部ﾘﾝｸ:test.up.bbspink.com
外部ﾘﾝｸ[html]:test.up.bbspink.com
外部ﾘﾝｸ:test.up.bbspink.com
[240|
320
|
480
|
600
|
100%
|
GIF
|
べ
|
ﾚｽ栞
|
ﾚｽ消
]
151: [sage] 2006/07/31(月) 14:38:31 ID:Sb043K9s Jim hello. I depend on machine translation. A Japanese law is revised. I think that there is a problem in "http://test.up.bbspink.com/upload.php". When an illegal image was uploaded, bbspink is brought into question directly by 1, uploader of bbspink. It is different from a note of url of a bulletin board Because 2, a bbspink bulletin board do not suffer from a site to offer an obscene image falling under a Japanese law to, I think that it is the method that is not good that treat an image in a bbspink domain. 3, anyone can make a page letting you think that you prepared of bbspink. Confusion happens thereby. http://test.up.bbspink.com/filestore/pinkbe.html This is a made example. There is little demand for "http://test.up.bbspink.com/upload.php". I wish that I want use to stop. Even if there is not uploader, there can be a bbspink bulletin board. I am concerned about problem outbreak by uploader in bbspink. http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1153928667/151
上
下
前
次
1-
新
書
関
写
板
覧
索
設
栞
歴
あと 686 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報
赤ﾚｽ抽出
画像ﾚｽ抽出
歴の未読ｽﾚ
ぬこの手
ぬこTOP
0.032s