[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Let's talk with Jim-san. Part2 (837ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

124: ◆MARY/2Kkkc 2006/07/30(日) 16:03:22 ID:Cwh6Szby(2/4)調 AA×
>>123


[240|320|480|600|100%|JPG|べ|ﾚｽ栞|ﾚｽ消]
124: ◆MARY/2Kkkc [sage] 2006/07/30(日) 16:03:22 ID:Cwh6Szby >>123 >>Deleter cannot do the deletion that makes the infringement of right and the law. So, your meaning is that a deleter does not need to follow the law when he/she judges a deletion, but he/she must follow only a deletion policy. The reason is because he/she is not a professional lawyer, and he/she has a legal risk since Jim is not in Japan. Is this your intention? What kind of a legal risk we have? Could you give me an example? http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1153928667/124

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

あと 713 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.015s