[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Chat in English (英語で雑談) part 213 (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞
このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ
696(5): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 724f-5N2V) 2019/10/21(月)21:31 ID:9hQKPK5s0(2/3) AAS
>>695
I'm a native speaker, boy howdy. 'Sentence construction' is the standard idiom we
use in English. But if you wanna keep on using 和製英語 and claim it's better than
standard English, you be you.
701: (ｱｳｱｳｴｰT Saaa-9H6v) 2019/10/21(月)22:40 ID:BPhe43vta(2/3) AAS
>>696
You are apparently a bogus "native speaker."
The >>689 sentence has no problem in every aspect.
And there is no need to use a grammatical term because the 689 guy states nothing about grammatical issues, regarding "sentence building capabilities."
The 696 comment is apparently made by a Japanese who has poor command of English.
This guy has self-proclaimed himself as a "native speaker" in the hope of gaining the upper hand.
Well, as for the sentence made by 689, there is no 和製英語.
So specifically point out any 和製英語, hmm, if your could lol
Your use of the word "standard" is totally wrong.
717(3): (JP 0H6a-1jLk) 2019/10/22(火)19:37 ID:gZ3SalQyH(1) AAS
>>696
nice try lad but i'm a real native speaker and you're obviously not
>>689
excellent, nobody would know you weren't a native speaker if all your sentences were like this
754: (ｽﾌｯ Sd1f-cdox) 2019/10/25(金)02:13 ID:Xs28jZ4Cd(1) AAS
>>717
Do you mean>>696 is Japanese or something like that?
764(2): (ｱｳｱｳｴｰT Sadf-ylhm) 2019/10/26(土)00:57 ID:jUh8Lfo4a(1/2) AAS
>>760
I'm not the native speaker you are seeking, but could provide some useful advice.
In my opinion, the >>696 post contains at least one grammatically dubious element, which I will later explain.
Looking at its whole, it is clear this guy is not an English native speaker.
As the native speaker demonstrated in >>755 it really makes no sense to call "sentence construction" an idiom.
How can a native speaker make such a stupid nonsense sentence?
As for the following sentence: "'Sentence construction' is the standard idiom we use in English."
This is complete gibberish.
The content of the sentence does not make any sense at all.
And on grammar, in my humble opinion, the article before "standard idiom" should be "a" instead of "the."
省1
786(2): (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 8f65-roNU) 2019/10/26(土)18:03 ID:c9Ccd5xg0(6/9) AAS
>>783
No, apparently he didn't mean that and genuinely thought >>696 was a non-native speaker.
Even >>755 thinks 696 is fishy, so I guess that particular post was really strange.
上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ
ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 1.414s*