[過去ﾛｸﾞ] IUTを読むための用語集資料集スレ (1002ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞
このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ
ﾘﾛｰﾄﾞ規制です｡10分ほどで解除するので､他のﾌﾞﾗｳｻﾞへ避難してください｡
665(2): 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆yH25M02vWFhP [] 2020/10/31(土) 19:27:58.81 ID:YFnoOBTS(8/13) AAS
>>663
>・（出張・講演）11月6日（金・日本時間）に予定されているBerkeley Colloquiumのオンライン講演のスライドを掲載。#IUTABC
>http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/2020-11%20Classical%20roots%20of%20IUT.pdf
これは一読の価値ありだな（＾＾
667(1): 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆yH25M02vWFhP [] 2020/10/31(土) 21:35:26.30 ID:YFnoOBTS(9/13) AAS
>>665 参考
https://events.berkeley.edu/index.php/calendar/sn/math.html?event_ID=133775
UC Berkeley
Mathematics Department Colloquium: Classical Roots of Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory
Colloquium November 5 Shinichi Mochizuki
New advances in mathematics are often portrayed as the ultimate outcome of a strictly linear march, i.e., as the erection of a towering edifice, floor by floor, building on the advances of the state of the art of the previous generation.
On the other hand, some advances in mathematics occur in such a way as to bear little resemblance to nearby generations, while sporting a somewhat striking "atavistic" resemblance to generations of the distant past. The present talk will focus on exposing the fundamental conceptual framework of inter-universal Teichmuller theory as a natural, albeit somewhat novel, outgrowth of mathematics that dates back partly to the 1980's (Faltings' invariance of the height of abelian varieties with respect to isogeny), partly to the 1960's (Grothendieck's theory of crystals), partly to the 1930's (classical complex Teichmuller theory), and partly to the nineteenth century (the Jacobi identity for the theta function on the upper half-plane). Just as it is entirely unrealistic to attempt to understand the notion of a Weil cohomology (such as etale cohomology) without first achieving an adequate level of understanding of the notion of singular cohomology in algebraic topology, it is substantially unrealistic to attempt to appreciate the central ideas of inter-universal Teichmuller theory in the absence of a solid grasp of the common thread ? consisting of a certain common underlying logical structure ? that permeates the (at first glance) somewhat disparate theories listed above (i.e., invariance of the height by isogeny, crystals, classical complex Teichmuller theory, and the functional equation of the theta function). This common underlying logical structure will form the central theme of the present talk.
671(1): 現代数学の系譜 雑談 ◆yH25M02vWFhP [] 2020/10/31(土) 23:20:12.78 ID:YFnoOBTS(13/13) AAS
>>670
私？ 私には、当然そんな力はありませんよ
でも、分からないなりに、斜め読みしていますよ
斜め読みして、>>663や>>665を書いています（＾＾
工学屋は、論文は最初から読んだりしません
まず、表題、著者、アブスト、序文、目次、結論
これらを読んで、この論文がどういうもので
自分に役に立ちそうか、面白そうかなど
を把握したあと
本文を読むべきかどうかを決める
数学などで、「本文が難しすぎて読めない〜！」（ハスキ風です）
とかありますよ、当然
そういうときはムリしません。どうするかは、そのとき次第。時間を掛けて読んでみるか、一旦おくかですね
上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ
ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.045s