Lisp Scheme Part41 (855ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新

---

803: 07/22(火)23:09 ID:7KXgok3Q(1) AA×


[240|320|480|600|100%|JPG|べ|ﾚｽ栞|ﾚｽ消]
803: [] 2025/07/22(火) 23:09:36.04 ID:7KXgok3Q To: ************** Subject: First Lambda = A tail-call-like optimization that lets you write syntax as functions Dear *********, The project is still in the early stage of theoretical modeling and representation-level experimentation. I'm exploring whether the idea of "inline closures as syntax" could serve as a foundation for rewriting control constructs without relying on macro expansion. First Lambda has the form: ((lambda ... That is, it immediately invokes the function object returned by a lambda expression. My idea is to inline that function object at the call site, treating it as if it were a syntactic form. I believe many constructs like let and while naturally take this shape. I would greatly appreciate your thoughts on this idea. Best regards, ***************** http://mevius.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/tech/1531587928/803

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

あと 52 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.026s