[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Let's talk with Code Monkey-san Part.4 (1002ﾚｽ)

Let's talk with Code Monkey-san Part.4 http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/

上下前次1-新
通常表示 512ﾊﾞｲﾄ分割 ﾚｽ栞
抽出解除 ﾚｽ栞

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

189: 名無し編集部員 [sage] 2014/06/21(土) 13:32:16.40 ID:WWubOVEw >>188 Is this the thread you discussed about changing settings? 葉鍵板 自治スレッド55 http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/leaf/1294407760/ http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/189

259: ◆4x5Y1Fmz1Jh0 [sage] 2014/06/30(月) 14:39:54.40 ID:NjTWMrWr >>258 I appreciate your kindness! The preparations for hunter board have completed here. sssp://img.2ch.net/emoji/2ch-okay.gif Well. >>256 may suggest that bbynews' abbreviation would be colored. e.g. <font color="red">[芸＋]</font> <font color="bue">[速＋]</font> like this? Thanks always. http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/259

288: ◆4x5Y1Fmz1Jh0 [sage] 2014/07/03(木) 13:00:47.40 ID:FppOWcMS >>286 Thank you. In my opinion, liveplus board shoud not be removed from bbynews because liveplus board is plus board without doubt. That board has the personality. But it's my opinion. Liveplus is only one semi-CAP plus board. And some plus board users dislike threads made by anonymous reporters simply. Therefore, we could exclude anonymous reporters' threads from bbynews to settle the matter. It may make some people happy. http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/288

383: 名無し編集部員 [sage] 2014/07/14(月) 21:37:04.40 ID:aH4GJ7YM Nice! hope.2ch.netの人気スレ http://hope.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/antianime/9247777777/ http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/383

475: 名無し編集部員 [sage] 2014/07/24(木) 14:18:38.40 ID:QZeloIJQ iosとandroidで共通だったりするからゲームアプリの方が良くね http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/475

565: 名無し編集部員 [] 2014/07/29(火) 21:23:23.40 ID:AY+z4NfB Code Monkey-san. Look at this place that was ravaged, How do you think? http://peace.2ch.net/fashion/ I know that it is not a problem that you corresponding. http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/565

568: 名無し編集部員 [sage] 2014/07/29(火) 22:13:57.40 ID:MGdocOaY Well, it was true. About rec'd924, please see >>486 also. http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/568

573: 名無し編集部員 [sage] 2014/07/30(水) 01:13:47.40 ID:E0qyH+Jx >>572 BBQに登録された串からは来ない BBQ自体は動いているけど大した数の串が登録されていないから次から次へと串が出てくる状態だね http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/573

588: 名無し編集部員 [sage] 2014/07/31(木) 18:53:26.40 ID:IZQWo3pd >>587 There is an answer from Jim-san (where you sent another post) Let's talk with Jim-san in operate. ★46 http://qb5.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/operate/1406138850/632 http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/588

678: 名無し編集部員 [sage] 2014/08/07(木) 15:30:10.40 ID:bh1LoxLW Do your best at work! http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/678

694: Apparently admin ★ [] 2014/08/11(月) 11:52:36.40 ID:??? >>693 Maybe it is only a symbolic gesture, but some of those users are still users, and have sent appreciation emails to me. http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/694

764: 名無し編集部員 [sage] 2014/08/22(金) 01:44:43.40 ID:ynsZmgU6 Hi Code Monkey san. In LoveLive! board, we discussed and make a decistion by voting to ask for removing board setting about n-day rule (ｎ日ルール, now is 15days), which causes automatical drop of threads after 15days it created. We hope the board being without n-day rule. Usually board setting request should be asked for "request thread" like: http://qb5.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/operate/1347285863/ But the n-day rule seems not a issue about SETTING.TXT. Where should we request about changing this kind of setting? best regards FYI: self-gonvernance and vote result can be found here: http://hope.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/lovelive/1407889796/ http://hope.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/lovelive/1408329355/ http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/764

828: 名無し編集部員 [sage] 2014/10/27(月) 08:54:53.40 ID:qCuEDvPm >>823 Did you REALLY understand all warnings the page says? It is true that be.2ch.net is not vulnerable to the POODLE, but the site uses the exploitable version of Open SSL and weak signature algorithm (SHA1 with RSA). No support for TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV and Forward Secrecy are also security concerns. You should fix these defects in order to improve the server's security. Thank you. http://mercury.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1401039505/828

---

ﾒﾓ帳

(0/65535文字)

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

Google検索

Wikipedia

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.633s*