[過去ログ] 英和辞典 12 [転載禁止]©2ch.net (1002レス)
1-
抽出解除 必死チェッカー(本家) (べ) 自ID レス栞 あぼーん

このスレッドは過去ログ倉庫に格納されています。
次スレ検索 歴削→次スレ 栞削→次スレ 過去ログメニュー
629: 2015/10/07(水)09:42 ID:Q04B8c/I(1/30) AAS
>>626
基本的な誤解はジーニアスは初学者向けでなく指導者向けの本だということ。
それで直訳的理解を前提として非常に上手い翻訳を提示したということ。
君は英字新聞が翻訳できないレベルだろう。
英字新聞が翻訳できるレベルになってから書き込みなさい。
違うというなら課題だそうか?
630: 2015/10/07(水)09:43 ID:Q04B8c/I(2/30) AAS
>>627
基本的な誤解はジーニアスは初学者向けでなく指導者向けの本だということ。
それで直訳的理解を前提として非常に上手い翻訳を提示したということ。
君は英字新聞が翻訳できないレベルだろう。
英字新聞が翻訳できるレベルになってから書き込みなさい。
違うというなら課題だそうか?
631: 2015/10/07(水)09:43 ID:Q04B8c/I(3/30) AAS
>>627
基本的な誤解はジーニアスは初学者向けでなく指導者向けの本だということ。
それで直訳的理解を前提として非常に上手い翻訳を提示したということ。
君は英字新聞が翻訳できないレベルだろう。
英字新聞が翻訳できるレベルになってから書き込みなさい。
違うというなら課題だそうか?
633
(1): 2015/10/07(水)10:07 ID:Q04B8c/I(4/30) AAS
>>627
課題1
I’ve described myself as a lukewarm opponent of the Trans-Pacific Partnership;
although I don’t share the intense dislike of many progressives,
I’ve seen it as an agreement not really so much about trade as about strengthening intellectual property monopolies and corporate clout in dispute settlement — both arguably bad things, not good, even from an efficiency standpoint.
But the WH is telling me that the agreement just reached is significantly different from what we were hearing before, and the angry reaction of industry and Republicans seems to confirm that.
634
(1): 2015/10/07(水)10:08 ID:Q04B8c/I(5/30) AAS
>>627
What I know so far: pharma is mad because the extension of property rights in biologics is much shorter than it wanted, tobacco is mad because it has been carved out of the dispute settlement deal,
and Rs in general are mad because the labor protection stuff is stronger than expected. All of these are good things from my point of view. I’ll need to do much more homework once the details are clearer.
635: 2015/10/07(水)10:10 ID:Q04B8c/I(6/30) AAS
>>632
さxさと>>633>>634を和訳してみろ。
出来ないなら二度と書き込むな。
いいな!!
636: 2015/10/07(水)10:13 ID:Q04B8c/I(7/30) AAS
簡単すぎたかな
637
(1): 2015/10/07(水)10:43 ID:Q04B8c/I(8/30) AAS
>>632
I’ve described myself as a lukewarm opponent of the Trans-Pacific Partnership;
although I don’t share the intense dislike of many progressives,
I’ve seen it as an agreement not really so much about trade as about strengthening intellectual property monopolies and corporate clout in dispute settlement — both arguably bad things, not good, even from an efficiency standpoint.
But the WH is telling me that the agreement just reached is significantly different from what we were hearing before, and the angry reaction of industry and Republicans seems to confirm that.
What I know so far: pharma is mad because the extension of property rights in biologics is much shorter than it wanted, tobacco is mad because it has been carved out of the dispute settlement deal,
and Rs in general are mad because the labor protection stuff is stronger than expected. All of these are good things from my point of view. I’ll need to do much more homework once the details are clearer.

和訳遅いよ。こんなの簡単だろ。
ただの馬鹿なの?
638
(1): 2015/10/07(水)11:02 ID:Q04B8c/I(9/30) AAS
>>637が和訳出来ないレベルは今後書き込み禁止。
英和辞典を語る資格なし。
640
(1): 2015/10/07(水)11:16 ID:Q04B8c/I(10/30) AAS
>>639
いちいちID変えるなカス
641: 2015/10/07(水)11:18 ID:Q04B8c/I(11/30) AAS
I’ve described myself as a lukewarm opponent of the Trans-Pacific Partnership;
although I don’t share the intense dislike of many progressives,
I’ve seen it as an agreement not really so much about trade as about strengthening intellectual property monopolies and corporate clout in dispute settlement — both arguably bad things, not good, even from an efficiency standpoint.
But the WH is telling me that the agreement just reached is significantly different from what we were hearing before, and the angry reaction of industry and Republicans seems to confirm that.
What I know so far: pharma is mad because the extension of property rights in biologics is much shorter than it wanted, tobacco is mad because it has been carved out of the dispute settlement deal,
and Rs in general are mad because the labor protection stuff is stronger than expected. All of these are good things from my point of view. I’ll need to do much more homework once the details are clearer.

これが和訳出来ないレベルは書き込み厳禁
643: 2015/10/07(水)11:29 ID:Q04B8c/I(12/30) AAS
I’ve described myself as a lukewarm opponent of the Trans-Pacific Partnership;
although I don’t share the intense dislike of many progressives,
I’ve seen it as an agreement not really so much about trade as about strengthening intellectual property monopolies and corporate clout in dispute settlement — both arguably bad things, not good, even from an efficiency standpoint.
But the WH is telling me that the agreement just reached is significantly different from what we were hearing before, and the angry reaction of industry and Republicans seems to confirm that.
What I know so far: pharma is mad because the extension of property rights in biologics is much shorter than it wanted, tobacco is mad because it has been carved out of the dispute settlement deal,
and Rs in general are mad because the labor protection stuff is stronger than expected. All of these are good things from my point of view. I’ll need to do much more homework once the details are clearer.

これが和訳出来ないレベルは書き込み厳禁
645: 2015/10/07(水)14:34 ID:Q04B8c/I(13/30) AAS
>>644
いちいちID変えるなカス

I’ve described myself as a lukewarm opponent of the Trans-Pacific Partnership;
although I don’t share the intense dislike of many progressives,
I’ve seen it as an agreement not really so much about trade as about strengthening intellectual property monopolies and corporate clout in dispute settlement — both arguably bad things, not good, even from an efficiency standpoint.
But the WH is telling me that the agreement just reached is significantly different from what we were hearing before, and the angry reaction of industry and Republicans seems to confirm that.
What I know so far: pharma is mad because the extension of property rights in biologics is much shorter than it wanted, tobacco is mad because it has been carved out of the dispute settlement deal,
and Rs in general are mad because the labor protection stuff is stronger than expected. All of these are good things from my point of view. I’ll need to do much more homework once the details are clearer.

これが和訳出来ないレベルは書き込み厳禁
646: 2015/10/07(水)14:35 ID:Q04B8c/I(14/30) AAS
このスレ馬鹿しかいないの?
647: 2015/10/07(水)14:38 ID:Q04B8c/I(15/30) AAS
>>644
お前は全然英文が読めないんだから書き込むな。

I’ve described myself as a lukewarm opponent of the Trans-Pacific Partnership;
although I don’t share the intense dislike of many progressives,
I’ve seen it as an agreement not really so much about trade as about strengthening intellectual property monopolies and corporate clout in dispute settlement — both arguably bad things, not good, even from an efficiency standpoint.
But the WH is telling me that the agreement just reached is significantly different from what we were hearing before, and the angry reaction of industry and Republicans seems to confirm that.
What I know so far: pharma is mad because the extension of property rights in biologics is much shorter than it wanted, tobacco is mad because it has been carved out of the dispute settlement deal,
and Rs in general are mad because the labor protection stuff is stronger than expected. All of these are good things from my point of view. I’ll need to do much more homework once the details are clearer.

これが和訳できるレベルになったら書き込めカス。
648: 2015/10/07(水)14:40 ID:Q04B8c/I(16/30) AAS
しかし>>644みたいな馬鹿は初めて見たよ。
650: 2015/10/07(水)16:55 ID:Q04B8c/I(17/30) AAS
>>649
外部リンク:ja.wikipedia.org
パクリしか出来ないアホは書き込むな

違うならこれをさっさと和訳してみろカス

I’ve described myself as a lukewarm opponent of the Trans-Pacific Partnership;
although I don’t share the intense dislike of many progressives,
I’ve seen it as an agreement not really so much about trade as about strengthening intellectual property monopolies and corporate clout in dispute settlement — both arguably bad things, not good, even from an efficiency standpoint.
But the WH is telling me that the agreement just reached is significantly different from what we were hearing before, and the angry reaction of industry and Republicans seems to confirm that.
What I know so far: pharma is mad because the extension of property rights in biologics is much shorter than it wanted, tobacco is mad because it has been carved out of the dispute settlement deal,
and Rs in general are mad because the labor protection stuff is stronger than expected. All of these are good things from my point of view. I’ll need to do much more homework once the details are clearer.
651: 2015/10/07(水)16:56 ID:Q04B8c/I(18/30) AAS
ほんとこいつ馬鹿だな。
書くこと全部パクリ。
653: 2015/10/07(水)16:59 ID:Q04B8c/I(19/30) AAS
たいして難しくない課題なのに呆れたアホだ。
654: 2015/10/07(水)17:00 ID:Q04B8c/I(20/30) AAS
>>652
添削してやるから訳してみな
1-
スレ情報 赤レス抽出 画像レス抽出 歴の未読スレ AAサムネイル

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.033s