多読のすすめ 2

[過去ﾛｸﾞ] 多読のすすめ 2 (1001ﾚｽ)
上下前次 1-新

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索歴削→次ｽﾚ栞削→次ｽﾚ過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

897(1): 2013/03/20(水)22:43 AA×
>>895

897:  [sage] 2013/03/20(水) 22:43:42.00

>>895
So you still don't believe me, huh?
How could I ever make you believe me?
Will you believe me if I translate what I just wrote above?
Okay, here I go!

僕は、面白かろうが面白くなかろうが、ともかく必要だと思ったものを広範囲に読んだ。
As far as I'm concerned, I didn't care whether I liked what I was reading.
I just picked up and read what I thought necessary.

自分にとって面白いものだけを読んだら、語彙が偏ってしまうから。
Why?  Because you'll develop a biased vocabulary if you
read nothing but what interests you.

英語のプロになり、英語のプロとして死ぬまで生き続けようと思うなら、
If you want to become a professional specializing in the English language,
and want to live on as a professional English user until the day you die,

自分にとって退屈なものさえ必死で読まないとダメだと思う。
then I think you have to read even what bores you, with all your might.

たとえば、僕は哲学とか文学とか心理学とかが好きで、経済とか法律とか商業なんて
I, for example, like philosophy, literature, psychology and things
like that and I greatly hate economics, law, and commerce,

大嫌いだが、わざと嫌いなものも読んだ。銀行関係の文章であろうと、
but I read on purpose what I hated.  I didn't care whether
what I was reading was about banking,

アメリカの大学生向けの刑法入門の本であろうと、何でもかんでも読んだ。
or books introducing U.S.students to penal law.
I simply read just about anything.

http://lavender.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/english/1363786125/897

上下前次 1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

あと 104 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報赤ﾚｽ抽出画像ﾚｽ抽出歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

ぬこの手ぬこTOP 0.334s*