[過去ﾛｸﾞ] Let's talk with Jim-san. Part2 (837ﾚｽ)
上下前次1-新

---

このｽﾚｯﾄﾞは過去ﾛｸﾞ倉庫に格納されています｡
次ｽﾚ検索 歴削→次ｽﾚ 栞削→次ｽﾚ 過去ﾛｸﾞﾒﾆｭｰ

---

127(2): ◆IZUMI162i6 2006/07/30(日)17:21 ID:H0sTRxna(5/8) BE AAS
> So, your meaning is that a deleter does not need to follow the law
> when he/she judges a deletion
No. I think Deleter must not follow the law.
All Japanese have to correspond to the infringement of right if it is possible.
If Deleter can do a legal judgment as the site, Deleter will not be able to escape the obligation.

Example
*****************************************************************
Dear BBSPINK,

This is IZUMI from IZUMI Corp in Japan.

Delete the following messages.
2chｽﾚ:erobbs
2chｽﾚ:erobbs

Your site damages our honor. delete it immediately.

Best regards,

*****************************************************************

The message might be a justifiable criticism.
However, you are hesitating in whether it is a justifiable criticism or an infringement of right.
Can you judge "Do not delete it" for this request?
And, can you say to other Deleter, "Please have the danger"?

---

上下前次1-新書関写板覧索設栞歴

---

あと 710 ﾚｽあります
ｽﾚ情報 赤ﾚｽ抽出 画像ﾚｽ抽出 歴の未読ｽﾚ AAｻﾑﾈｲﾙ

---

ぬこの手 ぬこTOP 0.139s*